Literature DB >> 21087906

Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger.

E Felts1, S Parratte, V Pauly, J-M Aubaniac, J-N Argenson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: UKA is an appropriate bone-sparing solution for focal advanced knee osteoarthritis in young patients. As the expectations of patients younger than 60 years of age are different from those in an older population, we aimed to evaluate quality of life and the quality of sports activity after UKA in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five UKAs in 62 patients younger than 60 (mean age: 54.7 years; mean BMI: 28 kg/m(2)) performed between 1989 and 2006 were included. At last follow-up (minimum 2 years), before the objective evaluation, patients were asked to fill in a KOOS questionnaire and a specific sports questionnaire including the UCLA score and questions from the Mohtadi score.
RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 11.2±5 years (range, 2-19 years), the KOOS score was higher than 75 points in 90% of the patients for the quality-of-life categories but also for the score's four other categories: 83.4% of the patients had resumed their sports activities and the mean UCLA score was 6.8 (range, 4-9); 90% of the patients reported no or slight limitation during sports activities. The function KSS improved from 52±4 to 95±3 points postoperatively and the Knee KSS from 50±4 to 94±4 points. With three patients undergoing revision for an isolated insert exchange, one for septic loosening and three for osteoarthritis in the external compartment, the 12-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 94%. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: These results confirmed that UKA can provide good patient-rated outcomes, which is very important in this demanding population. As for TKA, wear remains a problem in this active population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21087906     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  25 in total

1.  Unicompartmental arthritis in the aging athlete: osteotomy and beyond.

Authors:  Stephen F Johnstone; Michael J Tranovich; Dharmesh Vyas; Vonda J Wright
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Is isolated insert exchange a valuable choice for polyethylene wear in metal-backed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lunebourg; Sébastien Parratte; Alexandre Galland; François Lecuire; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Unicompartmental knee replacement provides early clinical and functional improvement stabilizing over time.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello; Alessandro Felici
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Combined unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Marco Tinius; Pierre Hepp; Roland Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Alexandre Lunebourg; Elke Viehweger; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup.

Authors:  Merrill Lee; Jerry Chen; Chia Shi Lu; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Daoyun Chen; Chen Zhu; Xiaoyun Pan; Xin Mao; Yongyuan Guo; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Ibrahim Akkawi; Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Michele Gagliardi; Marco Nitri; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.