P Sykes1, R H K Morris, J A Allen, J D Wildsmith, K P Jones. 1. University of Wales Institute, Cardiff (UWIC), Cardiff School of Health Sciences, Western Avenue, Cardiff CF5 2YB, United Kingdom. psykes@uwic.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To characterise compost workers' exposure to dust, endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan during various operational practices and investigate whether dust concentrations are a useful indicator of endotoxin exposure in compost workers. METHODS: This study assessed inhalable dust fractions, bacterial endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan in 117 personal samples and 88 ambient samples from four large-scale composting facilities. RESULTS: Employees' exposures to inhalable dust, endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan exhibited a large range. Inhalable dust was found to be generally low (GM 0.99 mg/m(3), GSD 2.99 mg/m(3)). Analysis of the biological component of the dust showed that employees' exposures to endotoxin were elevated (GM 35.10 EU/m(3), GSD 9.97 EU/m(3)). Employees' exposure to β-(1-3) glucan was low (GM 0.98 ng/m(3), GSD 13.39 ng/m(3)). Dust levels were elevated during manual sorting and screening of waste and high levels of endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan were observed during all practices involving the movement of waste. A significant correlation was observed between the personal dust levels and personal endotoxin concentrations (r=0.783, p<0.05) and that personal inhalable dust concentration may be a valuable predictor for personal endotoxin concentration in the sites studied. CONCLUSIONS: Workers at composting sites are exposed to high levels of bacterial endotoxin consistent with adverse respiratory outcomes even though in most cases, their personal dust exposure is below the suggested regulatory levels. Dose-response data for the biological components present in the dust encountered at composting sites are not well established at this time and site operators should adopt precautionary measures when assessing and managing these potential risks.
OBJECTIVES: To characterise compost workers' exposure to dust, endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan during various operational practices and investigate whether dust concentrations are a useful indicator of endotoxin exposure in compost workers. METHODS: This study assessed inhalable dust fractions, bacterial endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan in 117 personal samples and 88 ambient samples from four large-scale composting facilities. RESULTS: Employees' exposures to inhalable dust, endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan exhibited a large range. Inhalable dust was found to be generally low (GM 0.99 mg/m(3), GSD 2.99 mg/m(3)). Analysis of the biological component of the dust showed that employees' exposures to endotoxin were elevated (GM 35.10 EU/m(3), GSD 9.97 EU/m(3)). Employees' exposure to β-(1-3) glucan was low (GM 0.98 ng/m(3), GSD 13.39 ng/m(3)). Dust levels were elevated during manual sorting and screening of waste and high levels of endotoxin and β-(1-3) glucan were observed during all practices involving the movement of waste. A significant correlation was observed between the personal dust levels and personal endotoxin concentrations (r=0.783, p<0.05) and that personal inhalable dust concentration may be a valuable predictor for personal endotoxin concentration in the sites studied. CONCLUSIONS: Workers at composting sites are exposed to high levels of bacterial endotoxin consistent with adverse respiratory outcomes even though in most cases, their personal dust exposure is below the suggested regulatory levels. Dose-response data for the biological components present in the dust encountered at composting sites are not well established at this time and site operators should adopt precautionary measures when assessing and managing these potential risks.
Authors: Melissa C Friesen; Felicia Hung; Shuai Xie; Susan M Viet; Nicole C Deziel; Sarah J Locke; Pabitra R Josse; Jean-François Sauvé; Gabriella Andreotti; Peter S Thorne; Laura E Beane-Freeman; Jonathan N Hofmann Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2022-10-11 Impact factor: 2.779
Authors: Clare Pearson; Emma Littlewood; Philippa Douglas; Sarah Robertson; Timothy W Gant; Anna L Hansell Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2015 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Luigi Vimercati; Antonio Baldassarre; Maria Franca Gatti; Luigi De Maria; Antonio Caputi; Angelica A Dirodi; Francesco Cuccaro; Raffaello Maria Bellino Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annalaura Carducci; Gabriele Donzelli; Lorenzo Cioni; Ileana Federigi; Roberto Lombardi; Marco Verani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-14 Impact factor: 3.390