Literature DB >> 21087128

Oncologic outcome of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in the high-risk setting.

Jason D Engel1, William W Kao, Stephen B Williams, Y Mark Hong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of open radical prostatectomy in the high-risk setting. Management of high-risk disease with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is controversial. We examined biochemical recurrence in a selected cohort of high-risk patients who were undergoing RALP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing, nonsalvage RALP by a single surgeon without adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy of any kind were identified. High risk was defined by preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level >10 ng/dL, Gleason score ≥8 on final pathologic evaluation, or stage ≥pT(3). Postoperative PSA value ≥0.2 ng/dL defined biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 73 men were identified. There was no significant difference in surgical margin positivity (38% overall) or prostate size between recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts. Biochemical failure was significantly associated with higher pathologic Gleason score (P = 0.0085) but not pathologic stage (P = 0.22) or preoperative PSA level (P = 0.18). With follow-up to 85 months (mean 31.8 mos), biochemical recurrence-free survival was 77% with mean time to recurrence of 7.7 months. Recurrence occurred significantly earlier than later (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Reasonable short- to intermediate-term biochemical outcomes can be achieved in a recurrence-prone group of high-risk men who are undergoing RALP. RALP is feasible in a selected cohort of high-risk men who are undergoing aggressive local therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21087128     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  3 in total

1.  Matched comparison of outcomes following open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Ahmed Magheli; Natalia Leva; Stefan Hinz; Michelle Ferrari; Frank Friedersdorff; Tom Florian Fuller; Kurt Miller; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Posterior reconstruction and outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a high-risk setting.

Authors:  U Anceschi; M Gaffi; C Molinari; C Anceschi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.