PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of a preferred- versus a prescribed-intensity exercise session on pain in women with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS:Twenty-one women with FM (mean age = 44 yr) completed two randomly assigned exercise sessions consisting of 20 min of cycle ergometry at a self-selected intensity and a prescribed intensity. Experimental pain perception was assessed before and after aerobic exercise. During exercise, HR, watts, RPE, and muscle pain were assessed every 5 min. Clinical pain was assessed with the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) immediately and 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after exercise. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS:Women with FM preferred a lower intensity of exercise than what was prescribed as indicated by significantly lower HR, watts, and RPE responses (P < 0.05). Muscle pain in the legs, however, was similar in the two conditions and significantly increased during exercise (P < 0.05). Pain thresholds and pain tolerances increased significantly after exercise, whereas peak pain ratings decreased after exercise (P < 0.05). Furthermore, pain (SF-MPQ) in the follow-up period was found to be lower than baseline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the women with FM who participated in this study experienced significant improvements in pain after exercise. The results from this study are novel and indicate that recommendations for exercise prescription for individuals with FM should consider the preferred-intensity exercise model as a strategy to reduce pain.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of a preferred- versus a prescribed-intensity exercise session on pain in women with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Twenty-one women with FM (mean age = 44 yr) completed two randomly assigned exercise sessions consisting of 20 min of cycle ergometry at a self-selected intensity and a prescribed intensity. Experimental pain perception was assessed before and after aerobic exercise. During exercise, HR, watts, RPE, and muscle pain were assessed every 5 min. Clinical pain was assessed with the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) immediately and 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after exercise. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS:Women with FM preferred a lower intensity of exercise than what was prescribed as indicated by significantly lower HR, watts, and RPE responses (P < 0.05). Muscle pain in the legs, however, was similar in the two conditions and significantly increased during exercise (P < 0.05). Pain thresholds and pain tolerances increased significantly after exercise, whereas peak pain ratings decreased after exercise (P < 0.05). Furthermore, pain (SF-MPQ) in the follow-up period was found to be lower than baseline (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that the women with FM who participated in this study experienced significant improvements in pain after exercise. The results from this study are novel and indicate that recommendations for exercise prescription for individuals with FM should consider the preferred-intensity exercise model as a strategy to reduce pain.
Authors: Marijke van Santen; Paulien Bolwijn; Robert Landewé; Frans Verstappen; Carla Bakker; Alita Hidding; Désirée van Der Kemp; Harry Houben; Sjef van der Linden Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Willem J Kop; Angela Lyden; Ali A Berlin; Kirsten Ambrose; Cara Olsen; Richard H Gracely; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2005-01
Authors: Kelly Marie Naugle; Keith E Naugle; Roger B Fillingim; Brian Samuels; Joseph L Riley Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Laura Jgm van Weerdenburg; Christina Brock; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Harry van Goor; Marjan de Vries; Oliver Hg Wilder-Smith Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Julia Bidonde; Angela J Busch; Candice L Schachter; Tom J Overend; Soo Y Kim; Suelen M Góes; Catherine Boden; Heather Ja Foulds Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-21
Authors: Ulf Mathias Andersson; Anna Cristina Åberg; Lena von Koch; Annie Palstam Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.390