Literature DB >> 21084882

Role of home blood pressure telemonitoring in hypertension management: an update.

Gianfranco Parati1, Stefano Omboni.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing use of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in daily practice and the growing awareness in the scientific community about its positive impact on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with high blood pressure (BP), the potential advantages offered by HBPM have not yet been fully exploited. Indeed, use of the information offered by HBPM is often incomplete and imprecise, with the BP values reported by patients in handwritten logbooks being frequently inaccurate, illegible to physicians, or unreliable. Although a practical solution for improvement may come from the use of devices equipped with a storage memory, a step forward in this regard has been taken more recently with the introduction and refinement of systems for the remote telemonitoring of BP values measured at home. However, although several studies have provided evidence on the clinical usefulness of HBPM, only limited data are available on the clinical impact of home blood pressure (HBP) telemonitoring, because of a number of reasons. First, most of the available studies are characterized by a small sample size, and in some cases, the patients were neither randomized nor even matched with a control group. Moreover, technological solutions used in the different studies carried out so far are often heterogeneous, some of them being particularly difficult to use for the patients, thus limiting the effectiveness of the results. BP monitoring programmes, number of BP readings and transmission schedules are often different among the various studies. In addition, patient selection criteria are different from study to study. Finally, different study objectives and important diversities in the types of centres involved (ranging from general practices, to specialists' offices, hospitals or university centres) may have also influenced the quality of results. Large-scale randomized controlled studies, based on easy-to-use technologies, are thus still needed to show the superiority and clinical usefulness of HBP telemonitoring as compared with conventional HBPM. This study summarizes the evidence available on the clinical usefulness and current limitations of this approach, highlighting the results of meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials on this issue. The role of HBP teletransmission in the context of integrated patients' management programmes is also addressed, with indications for further progress in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21084882     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328340c5e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  16 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies.

Authors:  Y Duan; Z Xie; F Dong; Z Wu; Z Lin; N Sun; J Xu
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring and physician care in reducing office blood pressure.

Authors:  Yoon-Nyun Kim; Dong Gu Shin; Sungha Park; Chang Hee Lee
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Hypertension: Does home telemonitoring improve hypertension management?

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Efthimia G Nasothimiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  The role of telemedicine in hypertension management: focus on blood pressure telemonitoring.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Rossella Ferrari
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Telemedicine and M-Health in Hypertension Management: Technologies, Applications and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Marina Caserini; Claudio Coronetti
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2016-04-12

6.  Cost-effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring and case management in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease in Canada.

Authors:  Raj S Padwal; Helen So; Peter W Wood; Finlay A Mcalister; Muzaffar Siddiqui; Colleen M Norris; Tom Jeerakathil; James Stone; Shelley Valaire; Balraj Mann; Pierre Boulanger; Scott W Klarenbach
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Improving Medication Adherence Through Adaptive Digital Interventions (iMedA) in Patients With Hypertension: Protocol for an Interrupted Time Series Study.

Authors:  Kobra Etminani; Carina Göransson; Alexander Galozy; Margaretha Norell Pejner; Sławomir Nowaczyk
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  What influences patients' acceptance of a blood pressure telemonitoring service in primary care? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Adina Abdullah; Su May Liew; Nik Sherina Hanafi; Chirk Jenn Ng; Pauline Siew Mei Lai; Yook Chin Chia; Chu Kiong Loo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Patients' and clinicians' views on the optimum schedules for self-monitoring of blood pressure: a qualitative focus group and interview study.

Authors:  Sabrina Grant; James A Hodgkinson; Siobhan L Milner; Una Martin; Alice Tompson; Fd Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Richard J McManus; Sheila M Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Blood pressure control and treatment adherence in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: protocol of a randomized controlled study based on home blood pressure telemonitoring vs. conventional management and assessment of psychological determinants of adherence (TELEBPMET Study).

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Stefano Omboni; Angelo Compare; Enzo Grossi; Edward Callus; Achille Venco; Maurizio Destro; Giuseppe Villa; Paolo Palatini; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Simonetta Scalvini; Stefano Taddei; Dario Manfellotto; Stefano Favale; Carmine De Matteis; Michele Guglielmi; Laura Lonati; Francesco Della Rosa; Ellen Tosazzi; Anna Maria Grandi; Andrea Maria Maresca; Christian Mongiardi; Micaela Mare; Alessandra Rossi Ricci; Francesca Cagnoni; Joannhe Georgatos; Valeria Besostri; Viviana Ferrari; Ombretta Omodeo; Francesca Dorigatti; Elisa Bonso; Chiara Guarnieri; Lorenza Muiesan; Anna Paini; Deborah Stassaldi; Angelo Cinelli; Palmira Bernocchi; Silvana Rocchi; Armando Magagna; Lorenzo Ghiadoni; Irene Del Frate; Francesca Boresi; Antonella Guidi; Maria Antonietta Re; Luisa Pellicciotti; Antonia Florio; Giuliana Morani; Silvana Di Lillo; Antonietta Ambrosio; Antonio Casciello; Maria Quaglia; Cinzia Forleo; Maria Annunziata Ardito; Stefania Gerunda; Mariligia Panunzio
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.