Literature DB >> 21083912

Health promoting settings in primary health care - "hälsotorg": an implementation analysis.

Amina Jama Mahmud1, Ewy Olander, Lovisa Wallenberg, Bo J A Haglund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sweden, like many other western countries, faces increasing rates of lifestyle related diseases and corresponding rise in costs for health care. To meet these challenges, a number of efforts have been introduced at different societal levels. One such effort is "Hälsotorg" (HS). HS is a new health promotion setting that emerged in collaboration between the Swedish County Councils and Apoteket AB, a state-owned pharmacy company. HS's overall aim was to improve population health and facilitate inhabitants' responsibility for self-care. A new National Public Health Policy, introduced in 2008, emphasizes more focus on individual's needs and responsibility as well as strong need for county councils to provide supportive environment for individual-centred health services and increased health literacy among the population. In light of this policy, there is a need to examine existing settings that can provide supportive environment for individuals at community level. The aim of this study was to explore HS's policy implementation at local level and analyse HS's activities, in order to provide a deeper understanding of HS's potential as a health promoting setting.
METHODS: Materials included a survey and key documents related to the development and nature of HS on local and national levels. A policy analysis inspired by Walt and Gilson was used in data analysis. In addition, an analysis using the principles of health promotion in relation to HS policy process and activities was also carried out.
RESULTS: The analysis illuminated strengths and weaknesses in the policy process, its actors, contextual factors and activities. The health communication approach in the analysed documents contained health promoting intentions but the health promoting approach corresponding to a health promoting setting was neither apparent nor shared among the stakeholders. This influenced the interpretation and implementation of HS negatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that HS has potential to be a valuable health promotion setting for both population and individuals, given the strong intentions for a health and empowerment building approach that is expressed in the documents. However, for a more sustainable implementation of HS, there is need for an in- depth understanding of the health promotion approach among HS stakeholders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21083912      PMCID: PMC2993670          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  17 in total

Review 1.  'Settings' based health promotion: a review.

Authors:  S Whitelaw; A Baxendale; C Bryce; L MacHardy; I Young; E Witney
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  WHO Health Promotion Glossary: new terms.

Authors:  Ben J Smith; Kwok Cho Tang; Don Nutbeam
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 2.483

3.  Health promoting settings: future directions.

Authors:  Mark Dooris
Journal:  Promot Educ       Date:  2006

4.  Transcending the known in public health practice: the inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Katherine L Frohlich; Louise Potvin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A new public health policy in Sweden.

Authors:  Maria Larsson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Experiences from the Swedish determinants-based public health policy.

Authors:  Bernt Lundgren
Journal:  Promot Educ       Date:  2008-06

7.  Community participation and empowerment in Healthy Cities.

Authors:  Zoë Heritage; Mark Dooris
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 8.  Health promoting health services: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Clare McHugh; Anske Robinson; Janice Chesters
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Ann Dixon; Lyndal Trevena; Don Nutbeam; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  "If we only got a chance." Barriers to and possibilities for a more health-promoting health service.

Authors:  Helene Johansson; Lars Weinehall; Maria Emmelin
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2009-12-22
View more
  4 in total

1.  Staff perceptions of addressing lifestyle in primary health care: a qualitative evaluation 2 years after the introduction of a lifestyle intervention tool.

Authors:  Siw Carlfjord; Malou Lindberg; Agneta Andersson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Service Integration Across Sectors in Europe: Literature and Practice.

Authors:  Sarah van Duijn; Nick Zonneveld; Alfonso Lara Montero; Mirella Minkman; Henk Nies
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.120

3.  Health communication in primary health care -a case study of ICT development for health promotion.

Authors:  Amina Jama Mahmud; Ewy Olander; Sara Eriksén; Bo Ja Haglund
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Individual and collective empowerment and associated factors among Brazilian adults: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marcia Fatima Soares; Rachel Conceição Ferreira; Camila Alessandra Pazzini; Denise Vieira Travassos; Saul Martins Paiva; Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.