BACKGROUND: The presence of enterohepatic Helicobacter species (EHS) is commonly noted in mouse colonies. These infections often remain unrecognized but can cause severe health complications or more subtle host immune perturbations and therefore can confound the results of animal experiments. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize a putative novel EHS that has previously been detected by PCR screening of specific-pathogen-free mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biochemical analysis of enzyme activities (API campy), morphologic investigation (Gram-staining and electron microscopy) and genetic analyses (16SrRNA and 23SrRNA analyses, DNA fingerprinting, restriction fragment polymorphisms, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) were used to characterize isolated EHS. Genomic DNA fragments were sequenced to develop a species-specific PCR detection assay. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of spiral-shaped EHS, which varied in length (2.5-6 μm) and contained single monopolar or single bipolar sheathed flagella. The bacteria were grown under anaerobic conditions, preferably on agar plates containing serum or blood. The 16SrRNA, genetic, and biochemical analyses indicated the identification of a novel EHS species, named Helicobacter magdeburgensis. We also examined the genome content using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Based on the pattern produced by two restriction enzymes, BamIII and KspI, the genome size was determined to be about 1.7-1.8 Mbp. CONCLUSION: We isolated and characterized a novel EHS species, H. magdeburgensis, morphologically, biochemically, and genetically. These results are important for future studies on the prevalence and pathophysiologic relevance of such infections. Our PCR assay can be used to detect and discriminate H. magdeburgensis from other Helicobacter species.
BACKGROUND: The presence of enterohepatic Helicobacter species (EHS) is commonly noted in mouse colonies. These infections often remain unrecognized but can cause severe health complications or more subtle host immune perturbations and therefore can confound the results of animal experiments. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize a putative novel EHS that has previously been detected by PCR screening of specific-pathogen-free mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biochemical analysis of enzyme activities (API campy), morphologic investigation (Gram-staining and electron microscopy) and genetic analyses (16SrRNA and 23SrRNA analyses, DNA fingerprinting, restriction fragment polymorphisms, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) were used to characterize isolated EHS. Genomic DNA fragments were sequenced to develop a species-specific PCR detection assay. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of spiral-shaped EHS, which varied in length (2.5-6 μm) and contained single monopolar or single bipolar sheathed flagella. The bacteria were grown under anaerobic conditions, preferably on agar plates containing serum or blood. The 16SrRNA, genetic, and biochemical analyses indicated the identification of a novel EHS species, named Helicobacter magdeburgensis. We also examined the genome content using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Based on the pattern produced by two restriction enzymes, BamIII and KspI, the genome size was determined to be about 1.7-1.8 Mbp. CONCLUSION: We isolated and characterized a novel EHS species, H. magdeburgensis, morphologically, biochemically, and genetically. These results are important for future studies on the prevalence and pathophysiologic relevance of such infections. Our PCR assay can be used to detect and discriminate H. magdeburgensis from other Helicobacter species.
Authors: F E Dewhirst; C C Chien; B J Paster; R L Ericson; R P Orcutt; D B Schauer; J G Fox Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Junko K Akada; Keiji Ogura; Daiva Dailidiene; Giedrius Dailide; James M Cheverud; Douglas E Berg Journal: Microbiology Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: J G Fox; F E Dewhirst; J G Tully; B J Paster; L Yan; N S Taylor; M J Collins; P L Gorelick; J M Ward Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mark T Whary; Chuanwu Wang; Catherine F Ruff; Mallory J DiVincenzo; Caralyn Labriola; Lillian Ge; Yan Feng; Zhongming Ge; Vasu Bakthavatchalu; Suresh Muthupalani; Bruce H Horwitz; James G Fox Journal: Comp Med Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Dagmar Čížková; Josef Bryja; Jana Albrechtová; Heidi C Hauffe; Jaroslav Piálek Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Nicole Tegtmeyer; Francisco Rivas Traverso; Manfred Rohde; Omar A Oyarzabal; Norbert Lehn; Wulf Schneider-Brachert; Richard L Ferrero; James G Fox; Douglas E Berg; Steffen Backert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Judith Lind; Steffen Backert; Klaus Pfleiderer; Douglas E Berg; Yoshio Yamaoka; Heinrich Sticht; Nicole Tegtmeyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240