Literature DB >> 21083637

Six years' experience with high-intensity focused ultrasonography for prostate cancer: oncological outcomes using the new 'Stuttgart' definition for biochemical failure.

Thomas Ripert1, Marie-Dominique Azémar, Johann Ménard, Coralie Barbe, Rabah Messaoudi, Younes Bayoud, Jean Pierrevelcin, François Duval, Frédéric Staerman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To determine oncological outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer using a new, more accurate, definition ('Stuttgart' definition) of biochemical failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • We performed a retrospective review of all patients in our centre who received first-line treatment with a second-generation Ablatherm™ device (EDAP-TMS, Lyon, France). • Oncological failure was given either by biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen, PSA, nadir plus 1.2 g/mL) (Stuttgart definition) or the start of salvage therapy because of a persistently positive biopsy after the HIFU procedure. • The 5-year biochemical-free survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate were calculated.
RESULTS: • In total, 53 patients were included (mean age, 72.5 ± 4.5 years, range 60-79 years; 28 low risk and 25 intermediate risk). None had undergone previous hormonal therapy. Mean ±sd follow-up was 45.4 ± 15.5 months (range 16-71 years). Mean (range) pre-treatment PSA was 8.5 ± 4 (0.29-18) ng/mL. The median (range) PSA nadir value was 1 (0.01-14) ng/mL and occurred after a mean (range) of 5.09 (3-24) months. • Overall, 36 patients (67.9%) experienced oncological failure. • These included 33 cases (62.2%) of biochemical failure. A PSA nadir of ≤0.2, 0.21-1.0 and >1 ng/mL was reached in 20.8%, 30.2% and 49% of patients, respectively, and was associated with biochemical failure in 9.1%, 30.3% and 60.6%, respectively. • The 5-year biochemical-free survival rate and disease-free survival rate were 21.7% and 13.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a PSA nadir of >1 ng/mL was significantly associated with a risk of biochemical and oncological failure (P= 0.002 and P < 0.001). • Oncological failure was not associated with any risk group. • No patient died from prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: • In our experience, Ablatherm™ treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer was associated with a high rate of biochemical failure as determined by the 'Stuttgart' definition, and did not achieve effective cancer control. • The PSA nadir value after HIFU treatment was a significant predictor of treatment failure.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21083637     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09710.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: new treatments for localized tumours-what matters first?

Authors:  Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  A prospective clinical trial of HIFU hemiablation for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  R van Velthoven; F Aoun; Q Marcelis; S Albisinni; M Zanaty; M Lemort; A Peltier; K Limani
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Single high intensity focused ultrasound session as a whole gland primary treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: 10-year outcomes.

Authors:  Ksenija Limani; Fouad Aoun; Serge Holz; Marianne Paesmans; Alexandre Peltier; Roland van Velthoven
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2014-06-19

4.  The primary treatment of prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue He; Ping Tan; Mingjing He; Liang Hu; Jianzhong Ai; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.