Literature DB >> 21082456

Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E. coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow.

J S Teodósio1, M Simões, L F Melo, F J Mergulhão.   

Abstract

Biofilm formation is a major factor in the growth and spread of both desirable and undesirable bacteria as well as in fouling and corrosion. In order to simulate biofilm formation in industrial settings a flow cell system coupled to a recirculating tank was used to study the effect of a high (550 mg glucose l⁻¹) and a low (150 mg glucose l⁻¹) nutrient concentration on the relative growth of planktonic and attached biofilm cells of Escherichia coli JM109(DE3). Biofilms were obtained under turbulent flow (a Reynolds number of 6000) and the hydrodynamic conditions of the flow cell were simulated by using computational fluid dynamics. Under these conditions, the flow cell was subjected to wall shear stresses of 0.6 Pa and an average flow velocity of 0.4 m s⁻¹ was reached. The system was validated by studying flow development on the flow cell and the applicability of chemostat model assumptions. Full development of the flow was assessed by analysis of velocity profiles and by monitoring the maximum and average wall shear stresses. The validity of the chemostat model assumptions was performed through residence time analysis and identification of biofilm forming areas. These latter results were obtained through wall shear stress analysis of the system and also by assessment of the free energy of interaction between E. coli and the surfaces. The results show that when the system was fed with a high nutrient concentration, planktonic cell growth was favored. Additionally, the results confirm that biofilms adapt their architecture in order to cope with the hydrodynamic conditions and nutrient availability. These results suggest that until a certain thickness was reached nutrient availability dictated biofilm architecture but when that critical thickness was exceeded mechanical resistance to shear stress (ie biofilm cohesion) became more important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21082456     DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2010.535206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofouling        ISSN: 0892-7014            Impact factor:   3.209


  21 in total

1.  Monitoring bacterial biofilms with a microfluidic flow chip designed for imaging with white-light interferometry.

Authors:  Michelle Brann; Jonathan D Suter; R Shane Addleman; Curtis Larimer
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  A novel planar flow cell for studies of biofilm heterogeneity and flow-biofilm interactions.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Tadas S Sileika; Cheng Chen; Yang Liu; Jisun Lee; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Biofilm responses to smooth flow fields and chemical gradients in novel microfluidic flow cells.

Authors:  Jisun L Song; Kelly H Au; Kimberly T Huynh; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Biofilm-Growing Bacteria: Current and Emerging Methods.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Bonaventura; Arianna Pompilio
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Setup and validation of flow cell systems for biofouling simulation in industrial settings.

Authors:  Joana S Teodósio; Manuel Simões; Manuel A Alves; Luís F Melo; Filipe J Mergulhão
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-26

6.  Impact of wall shear stress on initial bacterial adhesion in rotating annular reactor.

Authors:  Thibaut Saur; Emilie Morin; Frédéric Habouzit; Nicolas Bernet; Renaud Escudié
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Experimental and visual research on the microbial induced carbonate precipitation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Yang Bai; Xu-Jing Guo; Yun-Zhen Li; Tao Huang
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  The Effects of Chemical and Mechanical Stresses on Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens Single- and Dual-Species Biofilm Removal.

Authors:  Inês B Gomes; Madalena Lemos; Susana Fernandes; Anabela Borges; Lúcia C Simões; Manuel Simões
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-29

9.  Biofilm localization in the vertical wall of shaking 96-well plates.

Authors:  Luciana C Gomes; Joana M R Moreira; Manuel Simões; Luís F Melo; Filipe J Mergulhão
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2014-04-13

10.  Estimation of a biofilm-specific reaction rate: kinetics of bacterial urea hydrolysis in a biofilm.

Authors:  James M Connolly; Benjamin Jackson; Adam P Rothman; Isaac Klapper; Robin Gerlach
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 7.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.