Literature DB >> 21081819

A non-voxel-based broad-beam (NVBB) framework for IMRT treatment planning.

Weiguo Lu1.   

Abstract

We present a novel framework that enables very large scale intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in limited computation resources with improvements in cost, plan quality and planning throughput. Current IMRT optimization uses a voxel-based beamlet superposition (VBS) framework that requires pre-calculation and storage of a large amount of beamlet data, resulting in large temporal and spatial complexity. We developed a non-voxel-based broad-beam (NVBB) framework for IMRT capable of direct treatment parameter optimization (DTPO). In this framework, both objective function and derivative are evaluated based on the continuous viewpoint, abandoning 'voxel' and 'beamlet' representations. Thus pre-calculation and storage of beamlets are no longer needed. The NVBB framework has linear complexities (O(N(3))) in both space and time. The low memory, full computation and data parallelization nature of the framework render its efficient implementation on the graphic processing unit (GPU). We implemented the NVBB framework and incorporated it with the TomoTherapy treatment planning system (TPS). The new TPS runs on a single workstation with one GPU card (NVBB-GPU). Extensive verification/validation tests were performed in house and via third parties. Benchmarks on dose accuracy, plan quality and throughput were compared with the commercial TomoTherapy TPS that is based on the VBS framework and uses a computer cluster with 14 nodes (VBS-cluster). For all tests, the dose accuracy of these two TPSs is comparable (within 1%). Plan qualities were comparable with no clinically significant difference for most cases except that superior target uniformity was seen in the NVBB-GPU for some cases. However, the planning time using the NVBB-GPU was reduced many folds over the VBS-cluster. In conclusion, we developed a novel NVBB framework for IMRT optimization. The continuous viewpoint and DTPO nature of the algorithm eliminate the need for beamlets and lead to better plan quality. The computation parallelization on a GPU instead of a computer cluster significantly reduces hardware and service costs. Compared with using the current VBS framework on a computer cluster, the planning time is significantly reduced using the NVBB framework on a single workstation with a GPU card.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21081819     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/23/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between IMRT and VMAT: dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monte Carlo simulations of patient dose perturbations in rotational-type radiotherapy due to a transverse magnetic field: a tomotherapy investigation.

Authors:  Y M Yang; M Geurts; J B Smilowitz; E Sterpin; B P Bednarz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.

Authors:  Ryan Neph; Cheng Ouyang; John Neylon; Youming Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Using deep learning to predict beam-tunable Pareto optimal dose distribution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gyanendra Bohara; Azar Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie; Steve Jiang; Dan Nguyen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  GPU-based high-performance computing for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Peter Ziegenhein; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A GPU-based finite-size pencil beam algorithm with 3D-density correction for radiotherapy dose calculation.

Authors:  Xuejun Gu; Urszula Jelen; Jinsheng Li; Xun Jia; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Deep learning-based inverse mapping for fluence map prediction.

Authors:  Lin Ma; Mingli Chen; Xuejun Gu; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Josh Evans; Meng Xu-Welliver; Cadron Pickett; Guang Jia; Quan Chen; Li Zuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interfacility variation in treatment planning parameters in tomotherapy: field width, pitch, and modulation factor.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Shimizu; Koji Sasaki; Takashi Kubota; Hiroshi Fukuma; Takahiro Aoyama; Tohru Iwata; Hiroyuki Tachibana; Takeshi Kodaira
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.