Literature DB >> 21081557

The pericardial window: is a video-assisted thoracoscopy approach better than a surgical approach?

Magdi Ibrahim Ahmad Muhammad1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The approach to the pericardial window in patients with pericardial effusion (PE) remains undefined as to whether a surgical (transthoracic or subxiphoid) or a thoracoscopic pericardial window is the optimal operative approach to PE. We hypothesized that the window into the pleural space created by the thoracoscopy might improve the outcome.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study between September 2007 and October 2009. All patients with PE diagnosed by echocardiography who attended the Cardiothoracic Department in King Fahd Hospital are included in this study. They were 30 patients (18 males, 12 females aged 44±1.22 years). Patients were subdivided into two groups. Group A, 15 patients underwent the surgical (transthoracic or subxiphoid) procedure and Group B, 15 patients underwent the video-assisted thoracoscopy procedure. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables, morbidity, recurrence, and survival were compared in both groups.
RESULTS: Preoperative variables were well-matched for age, sex, preoperative tamponade, echocardiographical characteristics and co-morbidities between both groups. No recurrence of effusion was observed in the two groups. Operative time was statistically highly significant (P<0.001); it was longer in Group B. There was no intraoperative complication in both groups. There was no postoperative complication in both groups except one case of superficial wound infection in Group A. There was no significance difference between both groups as regard duration of chest tube drainage and length of hospital stay. There was no in-hospital mortality in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial window by video-assisted thoracoscopy is an effective technique for pericardial drainage and biopsy. Apart from its diagnostic value, it allows the physician to fashion a pleuropericardial window for effective drainage while avoiding the complications of classic surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21081557     DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2010.243725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  5 in total

1.  Minimally invasive approach to thoracic effusions in patients with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sebastien Gilbert; Arman Kilic; Karl Yaeger; Yoshiya Toyoda; Christian Bermudez; Michael P Siegenthaler; Robert L Kormos
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-18

2.  Anterior parasternal approach for creation of a pericardial window.

Authors:  E Altman; O Rutsky; A Shturman; Y Yampolsky; S Atar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  The Association of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches and Mortality in Patients with Malignant Pleuropericarditis-A 10 Year Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Claudiu-Eduard Nistor; Camelia Stanciu Găvan; Alexandra-Andreea Ciritel; Alexandra Floriana Nemes; Adrian Ciuche
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  Surgical properties and survival of a pericardial window via left minithoracotomy for benign and malignant pericardial tamponade in cancer patients.

Authors:  Sezai Celik; Muharrem Celik; Bulent Aydemir; Handan Tanrıkulu; Tamer Okay; Nurşen Tanrikulu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic pericardial window in patients with pericardial effusions: a single-center case series.

Authors:  Ichiro Sakanoue; Hiroshi Hamakawa; Yu Okubo; Kazuhiro Minami; Ei Miyamoto; Yu Shomura; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.