AIM: Conservative procedures using dentin bonding agents are one of the important aspects of paediatric dental practice. The objective of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the microleakage of two self etching adhesives in primary and permanent teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four human anterior teeth (thirty-two primary and thirty-two permanent) were divided into four groups: primary teeth bonded using a 6th generation (Contax) bonding agent; permanent teeth bonded using a 6(th) generation (Contax) bonding agent; primary teeth bonded using a 7(th) generation (Clearfil S3) bonding agent; permanent teeth bonded using a 7(th) generation (Clearfil S3) bonding agent. A Class V cavity was prepared on all samples and were restored with composite resin as per manufacturers' instruction. After thermocycling, the teeth were stained with methylene blue, sectioned, and measured for microleakage. RESULTS: It was found a statistically significant difference in microleakage between incisal and gingival margins in each of the study group. CONCLUSION: Clearfil S3 (7(th) generation) bonding agent could be of greater advantage in paediatric dentistry than Contax (6(th) generation) because of its fewer steps and lesser microleakage in both primary and permanent teeth.
AIM: Conservative procedures using dentin bonding agents are one of the important aspects of paediatric dental practice. The objective of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the microleakage of two self etching adhesives in primary and permanent teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-four human anterior teeth (thirty-two primary and thirty-two permanent) were divided into four groups: primary teeth bonded using a 6th generation (Contax) bonding agent; permanent teeth bonded using a 6(th) generation (Contax) bonding agent; primary teeth bonded using a 7(th) generation (Clearfil S3) bonding agent; permanent teeth bonded using a 7(th) generation (Clearfil S3) bonding agent. A Class V cavity was prepared on all samples and were restored with composite resin as per manufacturers' instruction. After thermocycling, the teeth were stained with methylene blue, sectioned, and measured for microleakage. RESULTS: It was found a statistically significant difference in microleakage between incisal and gingival margins in each of the study group. CONCLUSION: Clearfil S3 (7(th) generation) bonding agent could be of greater advantage in paediatric dentistry than Contax (6(th) generation) because of its fewer steps and lesser microleakage in both primary and permanent teeth.