Literature DB >> 21080004

Human body area factors for radiation exchange analysis: standing and walking postures.

Sookuk Park1, Stanton E Tuller.   

Abstract

Effective radiation area factors (f (eff)) and projected area factors (f (p)) of unclothed Caucasians' standing and walking postures used in estimating human radiation exchange with the surrounding environment were determined from a sample of adults in Canada. Several three-dimensional (3D) computer body models were created for standing and walking postures. Only small differences in f (eff) and f (p) values for standing posture were found between gender (male or female) and body type (normal- or over-weight). Differences between this study and previous studies were much larger: ≤0.173 in f (p) and ≤0.101 in f (eff). Directionless f (p) values for walking posture also had only minor differences between genders and positions in a stride. However, the differences of mean directional f (p) values of the positions dependent on azimuth angles were large enough, ≤0.072, to create important differences in modeled radiation receipt. Differences in f (eff) values were small: 0.02 between the normal-weight male and female models and up to 0.033 between positions in a stride. Variations of directional f (p) values depending on solar altitudes for walking posture were narrower than those for standing posture. When both standing and walking postures are considered, the mean f (eff) value, 0.836, of standing (0.826) and walking (0.846) could be used. However, f (p) values should be selected carefully because differences between directional and directionless f (p) values were large enough that they could influence the estimated level of human thermal sensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21080004     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-010-0385-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  18 in total

1.  The physiological equivalent temperature - a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment.

Authors:  P Höppe
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The 3D scanner for measuring body surface area: a simplified calculation in the Chinese adult.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Yu; Yu-Hung Lo; Wen-Ko Chiou
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  The effects of solar radiation on thermal comfort.

Authors:  Simon G Hodder; Ken Parsons
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Simplified calculation of body-surface area.

Authors:  R D Mosteller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Estimating outdoor thermal comfort using a cylindrical radiation thermometer and an energy budget model.

Authors:  R D Brown; T J Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Effects of a moderate sized city on human thermal bioclimate during clear winter nights.

Authors:  S E Tuller
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.787

8.  Human body surface area: measurement and prediction using three dimensional body scans.

Authors:  P Tikuisis; P Meunier; C E Jubenville
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Body surface area prediction in normal-weight and obese patients.

Authors:  E H Livingston; S Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.310

10.  Human projected area factors for detailed direct and diffuse solar radiation analysis.

Authors:  K Kubaha; D Fiala; J Toftum; A H Taki
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 3.787

View more
  2 in total

1.  The angular distributions of ultraviolet spectral irradiance at different solar elevation angles under clear sky conditions.

Authors:  Yan Liu; LiWen Hu; Fang Wang; YanYan Gao; Yang Zheng; Yu Wang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Advanced view factor analysis method for radiation exchange.

Authors:  Sookuk Park; Stanton E Tuller
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.787

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.