| Literature DB >> 21079957 |
Jaclyn M Hall1, Thomas W Gillespie, Moses Mwangoka.
Abstract
Comparative studies on plant species richness, endemism, floristic composition, and structure between protected and unprotected forests are few in the Eastern Arc Mountains, one of the most biodiverse ecosystems in Africa. This study from one mountain range, the East Usambaras, examines floristic and structural tree data from 41-0.5 ha plots in four types of Eastern Arc forest: active agroforests, recently abandoned agroforests, mature secondary forest, and natural forest. Active agroforests had significantly lower tree species richness, endemic species richness, and stand density compared to natural and mature secondary forest. Recently abandoned agroforests contained a higher tree species richness, density, and tree height than active agroforests. Active and abandoned agroforests were dominated by an invasive tree, Maesopsis eminii. This tree species makes up a large percentage of the stems in active agroforests (26%), recently abandoned agroforests (32%), and in the canopy of mature secondary forests ∼ 30 years post logging (30%). Through time the increasing dominance of this non-native tree in active agroforests is a concern when considering the role of agroforests in a landscape scale conservation strategy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21079957 PMCID: PMC3142548 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9579-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Manage ISSN: 0364-152X Impact factor: 3.266
Fig. 1East Usambara Mountains of Tanzania, one of the Eastern Arc Mountains. Land cover classification and study sites in central East Usambaras (created from Landsat ETM+ Jan. 30, 2003)
Presences of seventeen species from the East Usambara Mountains that are endemic to the Eastern Arc
| Species endemic to Eastern Arc | Family | Ac (9) | Ab (13) | Ms (9) | Nt (10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Anisophyllaceae | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
|
| Annonaceae | 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
|
| Lauraceae | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 |
|
| Ulmaceae | 1 | 1 | ||
|
| Rubiaceae | 1 | 1 | ||
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 3 | 2 | ||
|
| Fabaceae | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
|
| Annonaceae | 2 | 3 | 8 | 6 |
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 2 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
|
| Moraceae | 4 | 11 | 9 | 8 |
|
| Sapindaceae | 3 | 3 | ||
|
| Sapotaceae | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
|
| Rubiaceae | 1 | 1 | ||
|
| Caesalpiniaceae | 1 | 4 | 3 | |
|
| Annonaceae | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
|
| Annonaceae | 1 | 1 | ||
|
| Verbenaceae | 1 | 2 |
Forest type: Ac: Active; Ab: Abandoned; Ms: Mature Secondary; Nt: Natural
Mean species richness, family richness, and endemic richness from 0.5 ha plots in the East Usambaras
| Forest type | Species richnessa | Family richnessa | Endemic richnessb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ac ( | Mean (SD) | 26 (3) | 20 (2) | 2.2 (1.0) |
| Ab ( | 38 (8) | 27 (3) | 3.3 (1.4) | |
| Ms ( | 44 (11) | 29 (4) | 6.3 (1.3) | |
| Nt ( | 40 (7) | 29 (3) | 5.4 (2.5) | |
| ANOVA | 9.31 | 15.26 | 12.11 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Post Hoc comparison of meansa,b | ||||
| Ac | Ab | −12.38c | −6.78c | −1.09 |
| Ms | −18.33c | −8.88c | −4.11c | |
| Nt | −13.06c | −8.05c | −3.18c | |
| Ab | Ac | 12.38c | 6.78c | 1.09 |
| Ms | −5.94 | −2.10 | −3.03c | |
| Nt | −1.21 | −1.26 | −2.09 | |
| Ms | Ac | 18.33c | 8.88c | 4.11c |
| Ab | 5.94 | 2.10 | 3.03c | |
| Nt | 4.73 | 0.83 | 0.93 | |
| Nt | Ac | 13.60c | 8.05c | 3.18c |
| Ab | 1.21 | 1.26 | 2.09 | |
| Ms | −4.73 | −0.83 | −0.93 | |
Forest type: Ac: Active; Ab: Abandoned; Ms: Mature Secondary; Nt: Natural
aVariance similar, Gabriel’s Post Hoc test used
bVariance statistically different, Games-Howell Post Hoc test used
cThe mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level
Mean number of stems from sites in the East Usambaras
| Forest Class ( | Stems <20 ma | Stems >20 mb | Prop | Prop | Endemic stems <20a | Endemic stems >20a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ac ( | Mean (SD) | 45 (27) | 69 (26) | 0.20 (0.20) | 0.26 (0.26) | 1.1 (1.5) | 2.6 (1.8) |
| Ab ( | 153 (61) | 142 (56) | 0.10 (0.09) | 0.32 (0.17) | 7.8 (5.3) | 4.3 (3.1) | |
| Ms ( | 163 (70) | 172 (65) | 0.02 (0.02) | 0.30 (0.07) | 23.2 (12.9) | 11.2 (7.2) | |
| Nt ( | 146 (84) | 136 (46) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.06 (0.05) | 22.3 (14.5) | 12.1 (10.4) | |
| ANOVA | 6.76 | 6.6 | 6.27 | 9.54 | 12.71 | 5.5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Post Hoc comparison of meansa,b | |||||||
| Ac | Ab | −107.97c | −73.27c | 0.10c | −0.05 | −6.74c | −1.75 |
| Ms | −117.56c | −103.00c | 0.18c | −0.03 | −22.01c | −8.67c | |
| Nt | −100.89c | −66.49c | 0.19c | 0.20 | −22.69c | −9.54 | |
| Ab | Ac | 107.97c | 73.27c | −0.10c | 0.05 | 6.74c | 1.75 |
| Ms | −9.59 | −29.73 | 0.07 | 0.02 | −15.26c | −6.91 | |
| Nt | 7.08 | 6.78 | 0.08 | 0.26c | −15.95c | −7.79 | |
| Ms | Ac | 117.56c | 103.00c | −0.18c | 0.03 | 22.01c | 8.67c |
| Ab | 9.59 | 29.73 | −0.07 | −0.02 | 15.26c | 6.91 | |
| Nt | 16.67 | 36.51c | 0.01 | 0.24c | −0.69 | −0.88 | |
| Nt | Ac | 100.89c | 66.49c | −0.19c | −0.20 | 22.69c | 9.54 |
| Ab | −7.08 | −6.78 | −0.08 | −0.26c | 15.95c | 7.7 | |
| Ms | −16.67 | −36.51 | −0.01 | −0.24c | .689 | 0.88 | |
Surveyed area 0.5 ha for trees ≥20 m, 0.1 ha for trees <20 m. Species endemic to the Eastern Arc. Forest type: Ac: Active; Ab: Abandoned; Ms: Mature Secondary; Nt: Natural
aVariance statistically different, Games-Howell Post Hoc test used
bVariance similar, Gabriel’s Post Hoc test used
cThe mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level
Fig. 2a Mean species richness, b Mean number of stems surveyed, c Mean number of stems of species endemic to the Eastern Arc Mountains. Forest classes: 9 active cardamom agroforests (Ac), 13 abandoned agroforests (Ab), 9 mature secondary forests (Ms), and 10 nature forests (Nt). Dark grey bars are trees <20 m tall (0.1 ha surveyed). Light grey bars are trees ≥20 m tall (0.5 ha surveyed)
Fig. 3Average number of stems >20 m per forest class. Black bars are average numbers of Maesopsis eminii, and light grey bars are average numbers of stems of other species
Fig. 4Biplot rendered by the nonmetric multi-dimensional scaling showing ordination of 41 sites on Axis 1, correlating with species richness (0.749) and stem density (0.942) and Axis 2 correlating with presence of Maesopsis eminii (0.844). Total species richness (Tot_Rich), total number of trees (#Stems), number of trees over 20 m (#Stems≥20 m), richness of endemic species (End_rich), number of Maesopsis. eminii trees (# M. eminii), and percent of stems being Maesopsis eminii (% M. eminii). Forest classes: active agroforest, abandoned agroforest, mature secondary, natural forest. The position of the grey dots indicates the graph scores of individual species relative to each axis
Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the plot level data, and Axes 1 and 2 produced with the non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination
| Pearson correlation | Axis 1, | Axis 2, |
|---|---|---|
| Number of trees | 0.949 | 0.165 |
| Number of trees >20 m | 0.896 | −0.005 |
| Species richness | 0.774 | 0.112 |
| Endemic richness | 0.421 | −0.434 |
| Number of endemic trees | 0.470 | −0.158 |
| Percent stems | −0.105 | 0.738 |
| Number of | 0.360 | 0.843 |
| % Variance explained | 85% | 7% |
Endemic richness refers to species endemic to the Eastern Arc Mountains