Literature DB >> 21078896

"You talkin' to me?" Self-relevant auditory signals influence perception of gaze direction.

Raliza S Stoyanova1, Michael P Ewbank, Andrew J Calder.   

Abstract

In humans, direct gaze typically signals a deliberate attempt to communicate with an observer. An auditory signal with similar signal value is calling someone's name. We investigated whether the presence of this personally relevant signal in the auditory modality would influence perception of another individual's gaze. Participants viewed neutral faces displaying different gaze deviations while hearing someone call their own name or the name of another person. Results were consistent with our predictions, as participants judged faces with a wider range of gaze deviations as looking directly at them when they simultaneously heard their own name. The influence of this personally relevant signal was present only at ambiguous gaze deviations; thus, an overall response bias to categorize gaze as direct when hearing one's own name cannot account for the results. This study provides the first evidence that communicative intent signaled via the auditory modality influences the perception of another individual's gaze.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21078896     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610388812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  13 in total

1.  Rapid neural discrimination of communicative gestures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Redcay; Thomas A Carlson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Eye'm talking to you: speakers' gaze direction modulates co-speech gesture processing in the right MTG.

Authors:  Judith Holler; Idil Kokal; Ivan Toni; Peter Hagoort; Spencer D Kelly; Aslı Özyürek
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  You talkin' to me? Communicative talker gaze activates left-lateralized superior temporal cortex during perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Kyle Jasmin; Frank Eisner; Zarinah K Agnew; Oliver J Josephs; Andrew J Calder; Rosemary Jessop; Rebecca P Lawson; Mona Spielmann; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.

Authors:  S Gareth Edwards; Andrew P Bayliss
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Dynamic causal modeling of eye gaze processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ivy F Tso; Mike Angstadt; Saige Rutherford; Scott Peltier; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Stephan F Taylor
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.662

6.  Neural responses to multimodal ostensive signals in 5-month-old infants.

Authors:  Eugenio Parise; Gergely Csibra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Humans have an expectation that gaze is directed toward them.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Andrew J Calder; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Dual-route model of the effect of head orientation on perceived gaze direction.

Authors:  Yumiko Otsuka; Isabelle Mareschal; Andrew J Calder; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Trait Anxiety Impacts the Perceived Gaze Direction of Fearful But Not Angry Faces.

Authors:  Zhonghua Hu; Maria Gendron; Qiang Liu; Guang Zhao; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-14

10.  How wide is the cone of direct gaze?

Authors:  Tarryn Balsdon; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.