M E Barra1, C López, G Fernández, E Murillo, E Villar, L Raya. 1. Catalan Institute of Health and Physiotherapy Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza. martinbarra@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the immediate effects of diacutaneous fibrolysis on pain and mobility in patients suffering from painful shoulder, and to assess the ability of the placebo technique to blind participants to group allocation. DESIGN: A double-blind before-after randomized placebo-controlled pilot study. SETTING:Two public centres of Primary Health Care of the Spanish National Health System. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients (29 women, 21 men) with a diagnosis of painful shoulder of subacromial origin were included. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The intervention group (N = 25) was actually treated with diacutaneous fibrolysis, while the placebo group (N = 25) was treated with placebo diacutaneous fibrolysis. MEASUREMENTS: Active range of motion (flexion, abduction, extension, external and internal rotation) and pain intensity in the hand-behind-back position were measured. Participants were also asked about their perception in terms of comfort of the technique and results obtained. RESULTS: Between-groups differences were significant in flexion (mean 11.4 degrees; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-17.1), abduction (mean 7.2 degrees; 95% CI 2.0-12.5) and internal rotation movements (mean 3.1 cm; 95% CI 0.1-6.1). There were no significant differences between groups in pain intensity, extension or external rotation movements. The placebo technique showed its ability to blind participants to group allocation. None of the participants suffered any adverse effects from diacutaneous fibrolysis. CONCLUSION:Diacutaneous fibrolysis may be an effective and safe therapeutic option to improve active range of motion in patients suffering from painful shoulder.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To describe the immediate effects of diacutaneous fibrolysis on pain and mobility in patients suffering from painful shoulder, and to assess the ability of the placebo technique to blind participants to group allocation. DESIGN: A double-blind before-after randomized placebo-controlled pilot study. SETTING: Two public centres of Primary Health Care of the Spanish National Health System. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty patients (29 women, 21 men) with a diagnosis of painful shoulder of subacromial origin were included. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups. The intervention group (N = 25) was actually treated with diacutaneous fibrolysis, while the placebo group (N = 25) was treated with placebo diacutaneous fibrolysis. MEASUREMENTS: Active range of motion (flexion, abduction, extension, external and internal rotation) and pain intensity in the hand-behind-back position were measured. Participants were also asked about their perception in terms of comfort of the technique and results obtained. RESULTS: Between-groups differences were significant in flexion (mean 11.4 degrees; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-17.1), abduction (mean 7.2 degrees; 95% CI 2.0-12.5) and internal rotation movements (mean 3.1 cm; 95% CI 0.1-6.1). There were no significant differences between groups in pain intensity, extension or external rotation movements. The placebo technique showed its ability to blind participants to group allocation. None of the participants suffered any adverse effects from diacutaneous fibrolysis. CONCLUSION: Diacutaneous fibrolysis may be an effective and safe therapeutic option to improve active range of motion in patients suffering from painful shoulder.
Authors: Carlos López-de-Celis; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Elena Bueno-Gracia; Pablo Fanlo-Mazas; Carlos Antonio Zárate-Tejero; Luis Llurda-Almuzara; Aida Cadellans Arróniz; Pere Ramón Rodriguez-Rubio Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sandra Jiménez-Del-Barrio; Aida Cadellans-Arróniz; Luis Ceballos-Laita; Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel; Carles López-de-Celis; Elena Bueno-Gracia; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Sandra Jiménez-Del-Barrio; Luis Ceballos-Laita; Elena Bueno-Gracia; Sonia Rodríguez-Marco; Santos Caudevilla-Polo; Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Aida Cadellans-Arróniz; Carlos López-de-Celis; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Luis Llurda-Almuzara; Vanessa González-Rueda; Pere Ramón Rodríguez-Rubio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390