Literature DB >> 21078577

Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment.

Zhou Wang1, Qiang Li.   

Abstract

Many state-of-the-art perceptual image quality assessment (IQA) algorithms share a common two-stage structure: local quality/distortion measurement followed by pooling. While significant progress has been made in measuring local image quality/distortion, the pooling stage is often done in ad-hoc ways, lacking theoretical principles and reliable computational models. This paper aims to test the hypothesis that when viewing natural images, the optimal perceptual weights for pooling should be proportional to local information content, which can be estimated in units of bit using advanced statistical models of natural images. Our extensive studies based upon six publicly-available subject-rated image databases concluded with three useful findings. First, information content weighting leads to consistent improvement in the performance of IQA algorithms. Second, surprisingly, with information content weighting, even the widely criticized peak signal-to-noise-ratio can be converted to a competitive perceptual quality measure when compared with state-of-the-art algorithms. Third, the best overall performance is achieved by combining information content weighting with multiscale structural similarity measures.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21078577     DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2092435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process        ISSN: 1057-7149            Impact factor:   10.856


  11 in total

1.  Visual stream connectivity predicts assessments of image quality.

Authors:  Elijah F W Bowen; Antonio M Rodriguez; Damian R Sowinski; Richard Granger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  Synthetic 18F-FDG PET Image Generation Using a Combination of Biomathematical Modeling and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Abazari; Madjid Soltani; Farshad Moradi Kashkooli; Kaamran Raahemifar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Image quality assessment based on inter-patch and intra-patch similarity.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Zongqing Lu; Can Wang; Wen Sun; Shu-Tao Xia; Qingmin Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.

Authors:  Heshalini Rajagopal; Norrima Mokhtar; Tengku Faiz Tengku Mohmed Noor Izam; Wan Khairunizam Wan Ahmad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Rectangular-Normalized Superpixel Entropy Index for Image Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Tao Lu; Jiaming Wang; Huabing Zhou; Junjun Jiang; Jiayi Ma; Zhongyuan Wang
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Image Quality Evaluation of Light Field Image Based on Macro-Pixels and Focus Stack.

Authors:  Chunli Meng; Ping An; Xinpeng Huang; Chao Yang; Yilei Chen
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Two phase non-rigid multi-modal image registration using Weber local descriptor-based similarity metrics and normalized mutual information.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Mingyue Ding; Xuming Zhang; Yi Wu; Jiani Hu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment with Linear Combination of Genetically Selected Quality Measures.

Authors:  Mariusz Oszust
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Single image super-resolution via Image Quality Assessment-Guided Deep Learning Network.

Authors:  Zhengqiang Xiong; Manhui Lin; Zhen Lin; Tao Sun; Guangyi Yang; Zhengxing Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Study on Distortion Estimation Based on Image Gradients.

Authors:  Sin Chee Chin; Chee-Onn Chow; Jeevan Kanesan; Joon Huang Chuah
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.