| Literature DB >> 21078139 |
Lois G Kim1, Claire Carson, Debbie A Lawlor, Shah Ebrahim.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women shows regional variations not explained by common risk factors. Analysis of CVD incidence will provide insight into whether there is further divergence between regions with increasing age.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21078139 PMCID: PMC2996371 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1Flow chart showing response to questionnaires and 7-year record review.
Baseline characteristics by region
| South England | Midlands/ | North England | Scotland | p-value^^ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of towns | 7 | 4 | 9 | 3 | |
| Contacted | 2216 | 1199 | 2873 | 1008 | |
| Responders at baseline | 1319 (60%) | 770 (64%) | 1650 (57%) | 547 (54%) | < 0.0005 |
| Responders in 2003 | 1141 (87%) | 633 (82%) | 1439 (87%) | 464 (85%) | 0.09 |
| Responders in 2007 | 846 (72%) | 450 (68%) | 1037 (71%) | 352 (74%) | 0.2 |
| Age (mean (SD)) | 69.3 (5.5) | 69.5 (5.6) | 69.6 (5.5) | 68.9 (5.3) | 0.06 |
| Smoking status | < 0.0005 | ||||
| Never | 817 (62%) | 418 (54%) | 864 (52%) | 272 (50%) | |
| Ex | 389 (30%) | 244 (32%) | 584 (36%) | 184 (34%) | |
| Current | 108 (8%) | 101 (13%) | 195 (12%) | 91 (17%) | |
| Missing | 5 (0.4%) | 7 (0.9%) | 7 (0.4%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Diabetes | 0.07 | ||||
| Yes (SR/RR) | 67 (5.1%) | 49 (6.4%) | 86 (5.2%)^ | 31 (5.6%) | |
| Yes (fasting glucose only) | 43 (3.3%) | 31 (4.0%) | 74 (4.5%) | 36 (6.6%) | |
| No | 1209 (92%) | 690 (90%) | 1490 (90%) | 480 (88%) | |
| Systolic BP (sitting, mm/Hg)* | 153.2 (23.9) | 155.4 (23.9) | 154.6 (24.0) | 153.3 (25.4) | 0.20 |
| Missing | 114 (9%) | 150 (20%) | 141 (9%) | 16 (3%) | |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.2 (1.1) | 4.2 (1.1) | 4.1 (1.1) | 4.1 (1.1) | 0.21 |
| Missing | 155 (12%) | 186 (24%) | 161 (10%) | 22 (4%) | |
| Waist circumference (mm)* | 861.0 (119.3) | 868.0 (120.7) | 861.9 (122.9) | 860.1 (125.8) | 0.63 |
| Missing | 84 (6%) | 126 (18%) | 123 (8%) | 3 (1%) | |
| Obesity | 0.29 | ||||
| Yes | 430 (33%) | 341 (44%) | 565 (34%) | 163 (30%) | |
| No | 813 (62%) | 296 (39%) | 967 (59%) | 382 (70%) | |
| Missing | 76 (6%) | 133 (17%) | 118 (7%) | 2 (< 1%) | |
| Leg length (mm) | 763.5 (41.4) | 753.4 (42.9) | 756.1 (40.2) | 752.2 (39.5) | < 0.0005 |
| Missing | 75 (6%) | 133 (2%) | 118 (7%) | 2 (< 1%) | |
| Family history of CVD** | 750 (57%) | 431 (56%) | 893 (54%) | 300 (55%) | 0.49 |
| Alcohol intake | < 0.0005 | ||||
| Most days | 253 (19%) | 127 (17%) | 276 (17%) | 58 (11%) | |
| Socially$ | 819 (62%) | 439 (57%) | 970 (59%) | 319 (58%) | |
| Never | 166 (13%) | 133 (17%) | 239 (15%) | 109 (20%) | |
| Missing | 81 (6%) | 71 (9%) | 165 (10%) | 61 (11%) | |
| Physically inactive$ | 739 (56%) | 510 (66%) | 935 (57%) | 285 (52%) | < 0.0005 |
| Missing | 149 (11%) | 90 (9%) | 214 (13%) | 97 (18%) | |
| Limited fruit/veg intake$$ | 33 (2%) | 44 (4%) | 93 (3%) | 40 (4%) | < 0.0005 |
| Missing | 129 (10%) | 83 (11%) | 242 (15%) | 90 (17%) | |
| Carstairs index based on GB population data (mean (SD)) | -0.9 (2.4) | 0.6 (2.7) | 0.5 (3.3) | 2.67 (3.4) | < 0.0005 |
| Missing | 24 (2%) | 1 (< 1%) | 8 (1%) | 36 (7%) | |
| Life-course SEP | 4 (2, 5) | 4 (3, 6) | 4 (2, 6) | 5 (3, 6) | < 0.0005 |
| Missing£ | 305 (23%) | 181 (24%) | 452 (27%) | 162 (30%) | |
| CVD medication | 487 (37%) | 252 (33%) | 673 (41%) | 262 (48%) | < 0.0005 |
| Non-missing for all covariates | 700 (53%) | 382 (50%) | 881 (53%) | 293 (54%) | 0.3 |
Note: Figures given in parentheses are percentages of the baseline responders unless otherwise stated
§ Alive at time of mailing
* Mean of measurements
** Sibling or parent had stroke or heart attack (self-report)
$ Those answering weekends only/once or twice a month/special occasions
$ Response to nurse-led examination question (not questionnaire)
$$ Missing where either summer fruit intake or winter fruit intake response is missing.
£ Missing at least one of the ten components of SEP. Missingness of individual components ranged from 2.5-14.4%.
^ Includes one individual with diabetes indicated by diabetic medicines only
^^ From chi-squared test for binary variables, linear regression for continuous variables, and ordered logistic regression for ordinal variables (life-course SEP). Analyses carried out on non-missing values only. Analysis of diabetes variable combined all "yes" categories.
CVD prevalence and incidence risk percent by region
| South England | Midlands/ | North England | Scotland | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of baseline responders | 1319 | 770 | 1650 | 547 |
| Prevalent CVD at baseline (% of baseline responders) | 213 (16.1%) | 177 (23.0%) | 320 (19.4%) | 135 (24.7%) |
| If prevalent disease at baseline | 5 (2.4%) | 7 (4.0%) | 16 (5.0%) | 4 (3.0%) |
| If no prevalent disease at baseline | 102 (9.2%) | 47 (7.9%) | 114 (8.6%) | 38 (9.2%) |
| If prevalent disease at baseline | 14 (6.6%) | 16 (9.0%) | 40 (12.5%) | 10 (7.4%) |
| If no prevalent disease at baseline | 32 (2.9%) | 21 (3.5%) | 40 (3.0%) | 17 (4.1%) |
| If prevalent disease at baseline | 19 (8.9%) | 21 (11.9%) | 55 (17.1%) | 14 (10.4%) |
| If no prevalent disease at baseline | 129 (11.7%) | 62 (10.5%) | 148 (11.1%) | 54 (13.1%) |
* Only applies to MI and stroke events (angina and unstable angina cannot be both prevalent and incident).
** Fatal and non-fatal events may sum to greater than the combined events since some individuals have both fatal and non-fatal CVD events (but the combined numbers only include the first of these, i.e. only include the non-fatal event)
Hazard ratios for region comparisons in Cox regression models of CVD incidence and fatalities
| N | South England | Midlands/ | North | Scotland | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 2253* | 1 | 0.79 (0.50, 1.26) | 0.97 (0.69, 1.37) | 0.70 (0.41, 1.19) |
| Model 2** | 2253* | 1 | 0.71 (0.44, 1.14) | 0.87 (0.61, 1.25) | 0.62 (0.35, 1.12) |
| Model 1 | 4281*$ | 1 | 0.64 (0.63, 1.23) | 1.06 (0.82, 1.36) | 0.92 (0.64, 1.33) |
| Model 2 | 4281*$ | 1 | 0.82 (0.58, 1.15) | 0.99 (0.76, 1.29) | 0.86 (0.58, 1.28) |
| Model 1 | 2256 | 1 | 0.83 (0.38, 1.83) | 1.19 (0.67, 2.10) | 1.59 (0.78, 3.25) |
| Model 2 | 2256 | 1 | 0.63 (0.28, 1.41) | 0.98 (0.54, 1.76) | 1.07 (0.48, 2.37) |
| Model 1 | 4284$ | 1 | 1.41 (0.91, 2.18) | 1.53 (1.06, 2.20) | 1.63 (1.01, 2.63) |
| Model 2 | 4284$ | 1 | 1.13 (0.72, 1.77) | 1.19 (0.82, 1.74) | 1.09 (0.66, 1.82) |
| Model 1 | 2253* | 1 | 0.77 (0.51, 1.16) | 1.01 (0.75, 1.36) | 0.92 (0.60, 1.41) |
| Model 2** | 2253* | 1 | 0.66 (0.43, 1.00) | 0.87 (0.64, 1.19) | 0.75 (0.47, 1.19) |
| Model 1 | 4281*$ | 1 | 0.98 (0.75, 1.28) | 1.20 (0.97, 1.48) | 1.14 (0.85, 1.53) |
| Model 2 | 4281*$ | 1 | 0.85 (0.64, 1.12) | 1.05 (0.84, 1.31) | 0.93 (0.68, 1.27) |
* excludes 3 with event on date of baseline questionnaire
$ excludes 1 with missing date of birth and 1 with missing date for baseline questionnaire
** some evidence for violation of proportional hazards (global test in non-fatal Model 2a, p = 0.04; in combined Model 2a, p = 0.03)
Model 1: unadjusted
Model 2: adjusted for risk factors as described in Table 1 (except diabetes, where all cases were merged to give a binary variable)
Figure 2Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival function for incident CVD events (whole cohort, irrespective of baseline CVD prevalence). All observed data (n = 4281).
Figure 3Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival function for all CVD events (prevalent and incident combined). First line shows mean age at baseline; second line shows mean age at seven-year follow-up. All observed data (n = 4285).