Literature DB >> 21077813

Perceived practice change in Australian doctors as a result of medicolegal concerns.

Louise M Nash1, Merrilyn M Walton, Michele G Daly, Patrick J Kelly, Garry Walter, Elizabeth H van Ekert, Simon M Willcock, Christopher C Tennant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceived impact of medicolegal concerns on how Australian doctors practise medicine and to compare doctors who have experienced a medicolegal matter with those who have not. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cross-sectional survey (posted in September 2007, with reminder 4 weeks later) of Australian doctors from all major specialty groups, trainees and a sample of general practitioners who were insured with a medical insurance company. PARTICIPANTS: 2999 respondents of 8360 who were sent the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceived practice changes due to concerns about medicolegal issues, beliefs about medicolegal issues, and the influence of medicolegal issues on both career choices and how doctors relate to their patients.
RESULTS: Respondents reported changes in practice behaviour due to medicolegal concerns, with 43% of doctors stating that they referred patients more than usual, 55% stating that they ordered tests more than usual, and 11% stating that they prescribed medications more than usual. Respondents also reported improved communication of risk (66%), increased disclosure of uncertainty (44%), developed better systems for tracking results (48%) and better methods for identifying non-attenders (39%) and for auditing clinical practice (35%). Concerns about medicolegal issues led to 33% considering giving up medicine, 32% considering reducing their working hours and 40% considering retiring early. These proportions were all significantly greater for doctors who had previously experienced a medicolegal matter compared with those who had not.
CONCLUSIONS: This Australian study, like international studies, confirms that doctors' concerns about medicolegal issues impact on their practice in a variety of ways. There is a greater perceived impact on those doctors who have previously experienced a medicolegal matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21077813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  8 in total

1.  The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Tom Bourne; Laure Wynants; Mike Peters; Chantal Van Audenhove; Dirk Timmerman; Ben Van Calster; Maria Jalmbrant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure.

Authors:  Berber S Laarman; Renée Jr Bouwman; Anke Je de Veer; Michelle Hendriks; Roland D Friele
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Reasons for acute referrals to hospital from general practitioners and out-of-hours doctors in Norway: a registry-based observational study.

Authors:  Jesper Blinkenberg; Øystein Hetlevik; Hogne Sandvik; Valborg Baste; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  The Personal and Professional Impact of Patients' Complaints on Doctors-A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Wallace; J Lowry; S M Smith; T Fahey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The disciplined healthcare professional: a qualitative interview study on the impact of the disciplinary process and imposed measures in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Lise M Verhoef; Jan-Willem Weenink; Sjenny Winters; Paul B M Robben; Gert P Westert; Rudolf B Kool
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Spine neurosurgeons facing the judicialization of their profession: disenchantment and alteration of daily practice-a qualitative study.

Authors:  Antoine Guillain; Anne-Hélène Moncany; Olivier Hamel; Carole Gerson; Renaud Bougeard; Grégory Dran; Bertrand Debono
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners.

Authors:  A Baki Kocaballi; Kiran Ijaz; Liliana Laranjo; Juan C Quiroz; Dana Rezazadegan; Huong Ly Tong; Simon Willcock; Shlomo Berkovsky; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.