Literature DB >> 2107771

Nutritional support in surgical practice: Part II.

M M Meguid1, A C Campos, W G Hammond.   

Abstract

On admission, a group of high-risk patients who are potential candidates for surgery can be identified, in whom prompt initiation of preoperative enteral or parenteral nutrition may reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality irrespective of the nutritional status. Among these are patients with inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal fistulas, and pancreatitis. Substantial nutritional support has little or no direct effect upon the pathogenesis of the disease, but the discontinuance of oral intake may well have a beneficial effect on the basic disease process. Thus, the provision of enteral or parenteral nutrition gives the patient an optimal opportunity to marshal host defenses in support of healing. In organ system failures, e.g., acute renal failure, liver failure, and pulmonary failure, appropriate nutritional support may assist the patient in coping with the abnormal intermediary metabolism resulting from such failure until satisfactory organ system function returns. From this review, it seems reasonably clear that the initially malnourished patient is less able to successfully withstand the adverse effects of vigorous therapy and/or severe illness than is the well-nourished individual. Hence, correction of malnutrition, either before initiating therapy or concomitant with the treatment, is very likely to be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2107771     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81290-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Resection and primary anastomosis with or without modified blow-hole colostomy for sigmoid volvulus.

Authors:  Sacid Coban; Mehmet Yilmaz; Alpaslan Terzi; Fahrettin Yildiz; Dincer Ozgor; Cengiz Ara; Saim Yologlu; Vedat Kirimlioglu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; S M Cohen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Pragatheeswarane; R Muthukumarassamy; D Kadambari; Vikram Kate
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Underweight patients and the risks of major surgery.

Authors:  J A Windsor
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Early Versus Delayed (Traditional) Postoperative Oral Feeding in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Behzad Nematihonar; Sohrab Salimi; Vahid Noorian; Majid Samsami
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2018-02-16

6.  Early postoperative oral feeding shortens first time of bowel evacuation and prevents long term hospital stay in patients undergoing elective small intestine anastomosis.

Authors:  Behzad Nematihonar; Akram Yazdani; Rofeideh Falahinejadghajari; Alireza Mirkheshti
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2019
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.