Literature DB >> 2107765

The quality of ambulatory care in Medicare health maintenance organizations.

S M Retchin1, B Brown.   

Abstract

The quality of ambulatory care received by Medicare recipients who enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) was compared to the care received by fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare recipients, in a quasi-experimental, non-randomized design. Both samples were drawn from the four major geographic areas in the country, and included two types of HMO practices: staff/group models, and independent practice associations (IPAs). A panel of expert physicians developed criteria for evaluating ambulatory care, and medical record abstractions using these criteria were performed on 1,590 outpatient records: 777 FFS and 813 HMO (441 staff/group, 372 IPA). While individual items of medical histories and physical examinations were performed most often for staff/group HMO patients and least often in FFS patients, odds ratios (OR) for performance in staff/group HMO patients were particularly large for health maintenance items: tonometry (OR = 8.4), mammography (OR = 2.7), pelvic examination (OR = 5.3), rectal examination (OR = 2.9), fecal occult blood test (OR = 3.3). The results suggest that recommended elements of routine and preventive care are more likely to be performed for Medicare enrollees in staff/group HMOs than in FFS settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2107765      PMCID: PMC1404568          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.4.411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  17 in total

1.  The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies.

Authors:  J B HALDANE
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Reliability of information abstracted from patients' medical records.

Authors:  L K Demlo; P M Campbell; S S Brown
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Critical issues in the assessment of quality of care and their relationship to HMOs.

Authors:  R H Brook
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1973-04

4.  Rates of surgical care in prepaid group practices and the independent setting: what are the reasons for the differences?

Authors:  J P LoGerfo; R A Efird; P K Diehr; W C Richardson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Expectations and experience of HMO enrollees after one year: an analysis of satisfaction, utilization, and costs.

Authors:  M Ashcraft; R Penchansky; S E Berki; R S Fortus; J Gray
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination experience in a family practice population.

Authors:  K Keller; E George; R N Podell
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Spending time with patients: the impact of organizational structure on medical practice.

Authors:  F D Wolinsky; W D Marder
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Comparative costs to the Medicare program of seven prepaid group practices and controls.

Authors:  P A Weil
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1976

9.  Breast cancer detection behavior among urban women.

Authors:  S Reeder; E Berkanovic; A C Marcus
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  The accuracy of the medical record as an index of outpatient drug therapy.

Authors:  R A Monson; C A Bond
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  15 in total

1.  Managed care plan performance since 1980: another look at 2 literature reviews.

Authors:  K Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Disparities in health and health care: moving from describing the problem to a call for action.

Authors:  C M Mangione; E Reynolds
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Implementation of preventive services in an HMO practice.

Authors:  S C Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  On quality of ambulatory care.

Authors:  J T Ashley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Treating depression in staff-model versus network-model managed care organizations.

Authors:  L S Meredith; L V Rubenstein; K Rost; D E Ford; N Gordon; P Nutting; P Camp; K B Wells
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Data envelopment analysis to determine efficiencies of health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  K Siddharthan; M Ahern; R Rosenman
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2000-01

Review 7.  Managed care and the delivery of primary care to the elderly and the chronically ill.

Authors:  D R Wholey; L R Burns; R Lavizzo-Mourey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  When is the quality of care good enough?

Authors:  S C Schoenbaum
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Do women physicians do more STD prevention than men? Quebec study of recently trained family physicians.

Authors:  B Maheux; N Haley; M Rivard; A Gervais
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Prostate cancer treatment and ten-year survival among group/staff HMO and fee-for-service Medicare patients.

Authors:  A L Potosky; R M Merrill; G F Riley; S H Taplin; W Barlow; B H Fireman; J D Lubitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.