Literature DB >> 21077424

Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC restorations: a systematic review.

Steffen Mickenautsch1, Martin J Tyas, Veerasamy Yengopal, Luciana B Oliveira, Marcelo Bönecker.   

Abstract

This systematic review sought to quantitatively answer the question as to whether, in tooth cavities of the same size, type of dentition and follow-up period, resin-modified glass-ionomer (GIC) restorations, when compared to conventional GIC restorations, offer a significant caries preventive effect, as measured by the absence of caries lesions at the margin of restorations. Six databases were searched for articles in English, Portuguese or Spanish until 07 May 2009. Four articles were accepted and 22 separate datasets extracted. The difference between both types of material were computed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). No meta-analysis was undertaken due to aspects of clinical/methodological heterogeneity. The results of the extracted datasets ranged between RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-1.01) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.71-1.63; p > 0.05) indicating no difference in the caries preventive effect between both types of materials. Further high-quality randomized control trials are needed in order to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21077424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent        ISSN: 0965-7452


  2 in total

1.  Coherence of evidence from systematic reviews as a basis for evidence strength - a case study in support of an epistemological proposition.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-01-12

2.  Research gaps identified during systematic reviews of clinical trials: glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.757

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.