Literature DB >> 21077156

Clinical implications of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown-rump length at 6-9 weeks' gestation.

A Pexsters1, J Luts, D Van Schoubroeck, C Bottomley, B Van Calster, S Van Huffel, Y Abdallah, T D'Hooghe, C Lees, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess intra- and interobserver agreement of routinely performed measurements-crown-rump length (CRL) and mean gestational sac diameter (MSD)-for assessing the likelihood of miscarriage in the first trimester of pregnancy using transvaginal sonography.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of CRL and gestational sac measurements in first-trimester pregnancies was conducted in a fetal medicine referral center with a predominantly Caucasian population. Gestational age ranged from 6 to 9 weeks. All patients underwent a transvaginal ultrasound examination using a high-resolution ultrasound machine. Two measurements of CRL and measurements of three diameters of the gestational sac were obtained by two observers. Agreement within and between observers for CRL and between observers for MSD was analyzed using 95% prediction intervals, Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: In total 54 patients were included in the study, with measurements obtained by both observers in 44 of these. Intra- and interobserver ICCs were high for CRL measurements, with values of 0.992 and 0.993 for intraobserver agreement and 0.993 for interobserver agreement. For the MSD, the interobserver ICC was 0.952. Limits of agreement were ± 8.91 and ± 11.37% for intraobserver agreement of CRL and ± 14.64% for interobserver agreement of CRL. For MSD, the interobserver limits of agreement were ± 18.78%. For an MSD measurement of 20 mm by the first observer, the prediction interval for the second observer was 16.8-24.5 mm. For a CRL measurement of 6 mm, the prediction interval for the second observer was 5.4-6.7 mm.
CONCLUSION: For dating purposes, there is reasonable reproducibility of CRL measurements using transvaginal ultrasonography at 6-9 weeks' gestation. When diagnosing miscarriage based on measurements of CRL care must be taken for values close to any decision boundary. The higher interobserver variability that we observed for MSD has implications for the diagnosis of miscarriage based on this measurement in the absence of a visible embryo or yolk sac.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21077156     DOI: 10.1002/uog.8884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Re-examining Sonographic Cut-off Values for Diagnosing Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Jennifer Bickhaus; Erin Perry; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale)       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Rationalising the change in defining non-viability in the first trimester.

Authors:  Fernando Infante; Ishwari Casikar; Uche Menakaya; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

3.  A prospective study to assess the clinical impact of interobserver reliability of sonographic measurements of fetal nuchal translucency and crown-rump length on combined first-trimester screening.

Authors:  Huseyin Aksoy; Sezin Ozyurt; Ulku Aksoy; Erol Mutlu; Sadan Tutus; Mustafa Alparslan Babayigit; Gokhan Acmaz; Ozge Idem Karadag; Burak Yucel
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2015-09-25

Review 4.  Problems of modern approaches to management of early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Müberra Namlı Kalem; Ziya Kalem; Ebru Yüce; Ayla Eser; Zehra Candan İltemir Duvan
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-15

5.  Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model.

Authors:  Laura Detti; Ludwig Francillon; Mary E Christiansen; Irene Peregrin-Alvarez; Patricia J Goeske; Zoran Bursac; Robert A Roman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Automated prediction of early spontaneous miscarriage based on the analyzing ultrasonographic gestational sac imaging by the convolutional neural network: a case-control and cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qixin Zhang; Chenghuan Yin; Lizhu Chen; Zeyu Yang; Shanshan Jia; Xue Sun; Yuzuo Bai; Fangfang Han; Zhengwei Yuan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Risk factors for missed abortion: retrospective analysis of a single institution's experience.

Authors:  Wei-Zhen Jiang; Xi-Lin Yang; Jian-Ru Luo
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.982

8.  Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  Jessica Preisler; Julia Kopeika; Laure Ismail; Veluppillai Vathanan; Jessica Farren; Yazan Abdallah; Parijat Battacharjee; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Cecilia Bottomley; Deborah Gould; Susanne Johnson; Catriona Stalder; Ben Van Calster; Judith Hamilton; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-23

9.  Measurement error of mean sac diameter and crown-rump length among pregnant women at Mulago hospital, Uganda.

Authors:  Sam Ali; Rosemary Kusaba Byanyima; Sam Ononge; Jerry Ictho; Jean Nyamwiza; Emmanuel Lako Ernesto Loro; John Mukisa; Angella Musewa; Annet Nalutaaya; Ronald Ssenyonga; Ismael Kawooya; Benjamin Temper; Achilles Katamba; Joan Kalyango; Charles Karamagi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Utility of trans-vaginal ultrasound in diagnosis and follow-up of non-pregnant sexually active females with lower ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Siddharth Pandey; Tanica Pandey; Apul Goel; Ajay Aggarwal; Deepanshu Sharma; Tushar Pandey; Satya Sankhwar; Gaurav Garg
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-01-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.