Literature DB >> 21076837

Feasibility of using gene expression analysis to study canine soft tissue sarcomas.

Jennifer A Mahoney1, Julie C Fisher, Stacey A Snyder, Marlene L Hauck.   

Abstract

The prognosis given for canine soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) is based primarily on histopathologic grade. The decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy is difficult since less than half of patients with high-grade STSs develop metastatic disease. We hypothesize that there is a gene signature that will improve our ability to predict development of metastatic disease in STS patients. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using cDNA microarray and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis to determine gene expression patterns in metastatic versus nonmetastatic canine STSs, given the inherent heterogeneity of this group of tumors. Five STSs from dogs with metastatic disease were evaluated in comparison to eight STSs from dogs without metastasis. Tumor RNA was extracted, processed, and labeled for application to the Affymetrix Canine Genechip 2.0 Array. Array fluorescence was normalized using D-Chip software and data analysis was performed with JMP/Genomics. Differential gene expression was validated using qRT-PCR. Over 200 genes were differentially expressed at a false discovery rate of 5%. Differential gene expression was validated for five genes upregulated in metastatic tumors. Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed increased relative expression of all five genes of interest in the metastatic STSs. Our results demonstrate that microarray and qRT-PCR are feasible methods for comparing gene signatures in canine STSs. Further evaluation of the differences between gene expression in metastatic STSs and in nonmetastatic STSs is likely to identify genes that are important in the development of metastatic disease and improve our ability to prognosticate for individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076837      PMCID: PMC3810003          DOI: 10.1007/s00335-010-9298-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  27 in total

1.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  M W Pfaffl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

3.  Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository.

Authors:  Ron Edgar; Michael Domrachev; Alex E Lash
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The mammalian septin MSF localizes with microtubules and is required for completion of cytokinesis.

Authors:  Mark C Surka; Christopher W Tsang; William S Trimble
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors.

Authors:  Sridhar Ramaswamy; Ken N Ross; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Effects of bone morphogenetic protein 2 on Id expression and neuroblastoma cell differentiation.

Authors:  Yang Du; Henry Yip
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Evidence for direct interaction between Sprouty and Cbl.

Authors:  E S Wong; J Lim; B C Low; Q Chen; G R Guy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-26       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A mammalian Partner of inscuteable binds NuMA and regulates mitotic spindle organization.

Authors:  Q Du; P T Stukenberg; I G Macara
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Sprouty2 attenuates epidermal growth factor receptor ubiquitylation and endocytosis, and consequently enhances Ras/ERK signalling.

Authors:  Esther Sook Miin Wong; Chee Wai Fong; Jormay Lim; Permeen Yusoff; Boon Chuan Low; Wallace Y Langdon; Graeme R Guy
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Lessons from genetic profiling in soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  M Nilbert; L A Meza-Zepeda; P Francis; J M Berner; H M Namløs; J Fernebro; O Myklebost
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  2004-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  A novel imaging system permits real-time in vivo tumor bed assessment after resection of naturally occurring sarcomas in dogs.

Authors:  William C Eward; Jeffrey K Mito; Cindy A Eward; Jessica E Carter; Jorge M Ferrer; David G Kirsch; Brian E Brigman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  DCE-MRI: a review and applications in veterinary oncology.

Authors:  M Keara Boss; N Muradyan; D E Thrall
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.613

3.  Comparative whole transcriptome analysis of gene expression in three canine soft tissue sarcoma types.

Authors:  Lydia Lam; Tien Tien; Mark Wildung; Laura White; Rance K Sellon; Janean L Fidel; Eric A Shelden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Gene expression profiling of histiocytic sarcomas in a canine model: the predisposed flatcoated retriever dog.

Authors:  Kim M Boerkamp; Marieke van der Kooij; Frank G van Steenbeek; Monique E van Wolferen; Marian J A Groot Koerkamp; Dik van Leenen; Guy C M Grinwis; Louis C Penning; Erik A C Wiemer; Gerard R Rutteman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Canine Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Can Being a Dog's Best Friend Help a Child?

Authors:  Bernard Séguin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.