Literature DB >> 21076652

A semi-parametric generalization of the Cox proportional hazards regression model: Inference and Applications.

Karthik Devarajan1, Nader Ebrahimi.   

Abstract

The assumption of proportional hazards (PH) fundamental to the Cox PH model sometimes may not hold in practice. In this paper, we propose a generalization of the Cox PH model in terms of the cumulative hazard function taking a form similar to the Cox PH model, with the extension that the baseline cumulative hazard function is raised to a power function. Our model allows for interaction between covariates and the baseline hazard and it also includes, for the two sample problem, the case of two Weibull distributions and two extreme value distributions differing in both scale and shape parameters. The partial likelihood approach can not be applied here to estimate the model parameters. We use the full likelihood approach via a cubic B-spline approximation for the baseline hazard to estimate the model parameters. A semi-automatic procedure for knot selection based on Akaike's Information Criterion is developed. We illustrate the applicability of our approach using real-life data.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21076652      PMCID: PMC2976538          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  6 in total

1.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines.

Authors:  S Durrleman; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A regression survival model for testing the proportional hazards hypothesis.

Authors:  C Quantin; T Moreau; B Asselain; J Maccario; J Lellouch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Spline-based tests in survival analysis.

Authors:  R J Gray
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Cytotoxics and hyperthermic perfusion: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J Tonak; P Hermanek; H Banz; H Groitl
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Hazard function estimation using B-splines.

Authors:  P S Rosenberg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Testing for Covariate Effect in the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model.

Authors:  Karthik Devarajan; Nader Ebrahimi
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 0.893

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Unified methods for feature selection in large-scale genomic studies with censored survival outcomes.

Authors:  Lauren Spirko-Burns; Karthik Devarajan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  On penalized likelihood estimation for a non-proportional hazards regression model.

Authors:  Karthik Devarajan; Nader Ebrahimi
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.870

3.  Bayes factors for choosing among six common survival models.

Authors:  Jiajia Zhang; Timothy Hanson; Haiming Zhou
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Meta-analysis identifies NF-κB as a therapeutic target in renal cancer.

Authors:  Suraj Peri; Karthik Devarajan; Dong-Hua Yang; Alfred G Knudson; Siddharth Balachandran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of Cox's Regression Model and Parametric Models in Evaluating the Prognostic Factors for Survival after Liver Transplantation in Shiraz during 2000-2012.

Authors:  R Adelian; J Jamali; N Zare; S M T Ayatollahi; G R Pooladfar; N Roustaei
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2015
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.