OBJECTIVE: To develop a decision-support tool to help policy-makers in sub-Saharan Africa assess whether intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) would be effective for local malaria control. METHODS: An algorithm for predicting the effect of IPTi was developed using two approaches. First, study data on the age patterns of clinical cases of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, hospital admissions for infection with malaria parasites and malaria-associated death for different levels of malaria transmission intensity and seasonality were used to estimate the percentage of cases of these outcomes that would occur in children aged <10 years targeted by IPTi. Second, a previously developed stochastic mathematical model of IPTi was used to predict the number of cases likely to be averted by implementing IPTi under different epidemiological conditions. The decision-support tool uses the data from these two approaches that are most relevant to the context specified by the user. FINDINGS: Findings from the two approaches indicated that the percentage of cases targeted by IPTi increases with the severity of the malaria outcome and with transmission intensity. The decision-support tool, available on the Internet, provides estimates of the percentage of malaria-associated deaths, hospitalizations and clinical cases that will be targeted by IPTi in a specified context and of the number of these outcomes that could be averted. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of IPTi varies with malaria transmission intensity and seasonality. Deciding where to implement IPTi must take into account the local epidemiology of malaria. The Internet-based decision-support tool described here predicts the likely effectiveness of IPTi under a wide range of epidemiological conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a decision-support tool to help policy-makers in sub-Saharan Africa assess whether intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) would be effective for local malaria control. METHODS: An algorithm for predicting the effect of IPTi was developed using two approaches. First, study data on the age patterns of clinical cases of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, hospital admissions for infection with malaria parasites and malaria-associated death for different levels of malaria transmission intensity and seasonality were used to estimate the percentage of cases of these outcomes that would occur in children aged <10 years targeted by IPTi. Second, a previously developed stochastic mathematical model of IPTi was used to predict the number of cases likely to be averted by implementing IPTi under different epidemiological conditions. The decision-support tool uses the data from these two approaches that are most relevant to the context specified by the user. FINDINGS: Findings from the two approaches indicated that the percentage of cases targeted by IPTi increases with the severity of the malaria outcome and with transmission intensity. The decision-support tool, available on the Internet, provides estimates of the percentage of malaria-associated deaths, hospitalizations and clinical cases that will be targeted by IPTi in a specified context and of the number of these outcomes that could be averted. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of IPTi varies with malaria transmission intensity and seasonality. Deciding where to implement IPTi must take into account the local epidemiology of malaria. The Internet-based decision-support tool described here predicts the likely effectiveness of IPTi under a wide range of epidemiological conditions.
Authors: Thomas Smith; Gerry F Killeen; Nicolas Maire; Amanda Ross; Louis Molineaux; Fabrizio Tediosi; Guy Hutton; Jürg Utzinger; Klaus Dietz; Marcel Tanner Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: D Schellenberg; C Menendez; E Kahigwa; J Aponte; J Vidal; M Tanner; H Mshinda; P Alonso Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-05-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Roly D Gosling; Samwel Gesase; Jacklin F Mosha; Ilona Carneiro; Ramadhan Hashim; Martha Lemnge; Frank W Mosha; Brian Greenwood; Daniel Chandramohan Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robin Kobbe; Christina Kreuzberg; Samuel Adjei; Benedicta Thompson; Iris Langefeld; Peter Apia Thompson; Harry Hoffman Abruquah; Benno Kreuels; Matilda Ayim; Wibke Busch; Florian Marks; Kwado Amoah; Ernest Opoku; Christian G Meyer; Ohene Adjei; Jürgen May Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Matthew Cairns; Ilona Carneiro; Paul Milligan; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Timothy Awine; Roly Gosling; Brian Greenwood; Daniel Chandramohan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Richard J Maude; Sompob Saralamba; Adrian Lewis; Dean Sherwood; Nicholas J White; Nicholas P J Day; Arjen M Dondorp; Lisa J White Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Julia K Nunes; Vicky Cárdenas; Christian Loucq; Nicolas Maire; Thomas Smith; Craig Shaffer; Kårstein Måseide; Alan Brooks Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 3.090