Literature DB >> 21076356

Reported wearing compliance of ready-made spectacles at 6 and 12 months.

Jerry E Vincent1, Satja Netek, Amy Parry, Derek Mladenovich, Nyunt Naing Thein, Paul R Amendola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ready-made spectacles are often used in low-resource environments, but to date, there has been little evaluation of the continued use of these spectacles over time. The aim of this study was to assess wearing compliance of those who received ready-made spectacles.
METHODS: The International Rescue Committee trains refugee health workers to provide simple refractive services and dispense ready-made spherical lenses to residents of refugee camps on the Thailand-Burma border. We conducted follow-up interviews in five camps among all eligible and available spectacle recipients who had been examined either 6 (n = 230) or 12 months earlier (n = 187). Interviewers asked about continued use of spectacles and, among those who had discontinued spectacle use, asked the reason for discontinuing.
RESULTS: Reported spectacle wear was significantly higher at 6 months compared with 12 months (73.9 vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001). At 6 months, wearing compliance was significantly higher for females than males (79.2 vs. 67.6%, p = 0.033), but gender differences in wearing compliance were not seen at 12 months, and no differences were found between 10-year age groups at 6 or 12 months. Wearing compliance rates among recipients seen at different camps were significantly different at both 6 months (range, 58.1 to 87.5%, p = 0.005) and 12 months (range, 32 to 85.7%, p = 0.002). The top reason given for discontinued spectacle wear was broken frames, followed by vision-related complaints, scratched lenses, lost spectacles, and appearance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that spectacle wearing compliance studies will not be comparable unless a standard time frame is used to assess compliance. We found assessing self-reported compliance to be a useful tool in guiding our program. Understanding the reasons for non-compliance will help guide corrective action and planning of interventions designed to increase wearing rates.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076356     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fef3a9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  9 in total

1.  Spectacle wear in children given spectacles through a school-based program.

Authors:  Dawn H Messer; G Lynn Mitchell; J Daniel Twelker; Mabel Crescioni
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Visual Health and Visual Healthcare Access in Refugees and Displaced Persons: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sila Bal; Anne Duckles; Alison Buttenheim
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-02

3.  Predictors of Spectacle Wear and Reasons for Nonwear in Students Randomized to Ready-made or Custom-made Spectacles: Results of Secondary Objectives From a Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Jennifer Evans; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger.

Authors:  Matthew J Lentsch; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Cost effectiveness of strategies to combat vision and hearing loss in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia: mathematical modelling study.

Authors:  Rob Baltussen; Andrew Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-02

6.  Spectacle wearing in children randomised to ready-made or custom spectacles, and potential cost savings to programmes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Kaushik Murali; Jennifer Evans; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Patient satisfaction and acceptance of spherical equivalent spectacles correction wear in rural India.

Authors:  B Sandeep Reddy; Taraprasad Das; Ghansyam S Mirdha; Nagavardhan Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  Self-adjustable glasses in the developing world.

Authors:  Venkata S Murthy Gudlavalleti; Komal Preet Allagh; Aashrai Sv Gudlavalleti
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-17

9.  Burden of eye disease and demand for care in the Bangladesh Rohingya displaced population and host community: A cohort study.

Authors:  Munir Ahmed; Noelle Whitestone; Jennifer L Patnaik; Mohammad Awlad Hossain; Lutful Husain; Mohammed Alauddin; Mushfiqur Rahaman; David Hunter Cherwek; Nathan Congdon; Danny Haddad
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.