AIMS: To study the validity of detecting panic disorder (PD) using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in a high-risk population in primary care and to test whether modified evaluation algorithms improve the operating characteristics of this questionnaire. Furthermore, the influence of psychiatric comorbidity on the test characteristics of the panic module was studied. METHODS: The PHQ was administered in a primary care sample with patients at high-risk for psychiatric disorders. The total sample of 479 high-risk patients comprised 311 frequent attenders (FA), 39 patients with unexplained somatic complaints (USC) and 191 patients with mental health problems (MHP). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID- I) was the reference standard for the presence of PD. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. The conditional test characteristics were calculated based on the observed prevalence of PD in the three high-risk groups. RESULTS: PD was diagnosed in 4.8% of the FAs, in 9.8% of the USCs and in 7.6% of the MHPs. The PHQ achieved moderate operating characteristics. Modified evaluation algorithms of the questionnaire led to an improvement of test characteristics, especially the screening question: sensitivity .71 and specificity .83. Psychiatric comorbidity increased sensitivity while decreasing specificity. CONCLUSION: The original and modified algorithms of the PHQ-PD performed moderately in screening for panic disorder. Using only the first question of the PHQ-PD showed the best psychometric properties (sensitivity). For screening purposes requiring high sensitivity we endorse to use the screening question instead of the original algorithm.
AIMS: To study the validity of detecting panic disorder (PD) using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in a high-risk population in primary care and to test whether modified evaluation algorithms improve the operating characteristics of this questionnaire. Furthermore, the influence of psychiatric comorbidity on the test characteristics of the panic module was studied. METHODS: The PHQ was administered in a primary care sample with patients at high-risk for psychiatric disorders. The total sample of 479 high-risk patients comprised 311 frequent attenders (FA), 39 patients with unexplained somatic complaints (USC) and 191 patients with mental health problems (MHP). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID- I) was the reference standard for the presence of PD. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. The conditional test characteristics were calculated based on the observed prevalence of PD in the three high-risk groups. RESULTS:PD was diagnosed in 4.8% of the FAs, in 9.8% of the USCs and in 7.6% of the MHPs. The PHQ achieved moderate operating characteristics. Modified evaluation algorithms of the questionnaire led to an improvement of test characteristics, especially the screening question: sensitivity .71 and specificity .83. Psychiatric comorbidity increased sensitivity while decreasing specificity. CONCLUSION: The original and modified algorithms of the PHQ-PD performed moderately in screening for panic disorder. Using only the first question of the PHQ-PD showed the best psychometric properties (sensitivity). For screening purposes requiring high sensitivity we endorse to use the screening question instead of the original algorithm.
Authors: Tanyka Suzanne Sam; Heidi E Hutton; Bryan Lau; Mary E McCaul; Jeanne Keruly; Richard Moore; Geetanjali Chander Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-11
Authors: D R Bailey Miles; Usama Bilal; Heidi E Hutton; Bryan Lau; Catherine R Lesko; Anthony Fojo; Mary E McCaul; Jeanne Keruly; Richard D Moore; Geetanjali Chander Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2019
Authors: Usama Bilal; Mary E McCaul; Heidi M Crane; W Christopher Mathews; Kenneth H Mayer; Elvin Geng; Sonia Napravnik; Karen L Cropsey; Michael J Mugavero; Michael S Saag; Heidi Hutton; Bryan Lau; Geetanjali Chander Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Mary E McCaul; Heidi E Hutton; Karen L Cropsey; Heidi M Crane; Catherine R Lesko; Geetanjali Chander; Michael J Mugavero; Mari M Kitahata; Bryan Lau; Michael S Saag Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-05-16
Authors: Catherine R Lesko; Robin M Nance; Bryan Lau; Anthony T Fojo; Heidi E Hutton; Joseph A C Delaney; Heidi M Crane; Karen L Cropsey; Kenneth H Mayer; Sonia Napravnik; Elvin Geng; W Christopher Mathews; Mary E McCaul; Geetanjali Chander Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: Antonio Cano-Vindel; Roger Muñoz-Navarro; Cristina Mae Wood; Joaquín T Limonero; Leonardo Adrián Medrano; Paloma Ruiz-Rodríguez; Irene Gracia-Gracia; Esperanza Dongil-Collado; Iciar Iruarrizaga; Fernando Chacón; Francisco Santolaya Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-12-23
Authors: Anna D T Muntingh; Eric W De Heer; Harm W J Van Marwijk; Herman J Adèr; Anton J L M Van Balkom; Philip Spinhoven; Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Paloma Ruiz-Rodríguez; Antonio Cano-Vindel; Roger Muñoz-Navarro; Cristina M Wood; Leonardo A Medrano; Luciana Sofía Moretti Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2018-03-06