BACKGROUND: Intracellularly, the ubiquitin-proteasome system participates in crucial functions such as cell cycling, differentiation, proliferation, gene transcription, and apoptosis. However, in malignancies including ovarian cancer increased extracellular concentrations of circulating 20S proteasomes (c-proteasomes) have been detected in blood. We tested the hypothesis that the c-proteasome plasma concentration is a biomarker associated with the clinical course of ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: 20S-proteasome venous plasma concentration was measured by ELISA in patients presenting with ovarian cancer before (n=120) and after (n=68) primary treatment, and in healthy volunteers (n=55). The median follow-up time was 19 months. To assess the relation of proteasome expression with c-proteasome concentration, tumor specimens from 27 patients were immunohistochemically stained for 20S proteasome using an antibody directed against the core subunits of the catalytic domain of the 20S proteasome. RESULTS: Median c-proteasome concentration was higher (p<0.0001) in untreated ovarian cancer patients (457.5 ng/ml, range: 200-12540 ng/ml) than in healthy controls 290 ng/ml, range: 140-425 ng/ml). Following completion of primary treatment, the median c-proteasome concentration increased (p=0.003) relative to baseline (595 ng/ml, range: 200-20000 ng/ml) and concentrations positively correlated (p=0.031) with residual disease left at primary surgery. Patients with post-treatment c-proteasome concentrations exceeding the cohort's median showed a diminished survival (p=0.045). We found no correlation between c-proteasome concentration and strength of proteasomal staining in tumor specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating proteasome concentrations correlate with residual tumor mass and might be a prognostic variable in ovarian cancer following primary therapy.
BACKGROUND: Intracellularly, the ubiquitin-proteasome system participates in crucial functions such as cell cycling, differentiation, proliferation, gene transcription, and apoptosis. However, in malignancies including ovarian cancer increased extracellular concentrations of circulating 20S proteasomes (c-proteasomes) have been detected in blood. We tested the hypothesis that the c-proteasome plasma concentration is a biomarker associated with the clinical course of ovarian cancerpatients. METHODS: 20S-proteasome venous plasma concentration was measured by ELISA in patients presenting with ovarian cancer before (n=120) and after (n=68) primary treatment, and in healthy volunteers (n=55). The median follow-up time was 19 months. To assess the relation of proteasome expression with c-proteasome concentration, tumor specimens from 27 patients were immunohistochemically stained for 20S proteasome using an antibody directed against the core subunits of the catalytic domain of the 20S proteasome. RESULTS: Median c-proteasome concentration was higher (p<0.0001) in untreated ovarian cancerpatients (457.5 ng/ml, range: 200-12540 ng/ml) than in healthy controls 290 ng/ml, range: 140-425 ng/ml). Following completion of primary treatment, the median c-proteasome concentration increased (p=0.003) relative to baseline (595 ng/ml, range: 200-20000 ng/ml) and concentrations positively correlated (p=0.031) with residual disease left at primary surgery. Patients with post-treatment c-proteasome concentrations exceeding the cohort's median showed a diminished survival (p=0.045). We found no correlation between c-proteasome concentration and strength of proteasomal staining in tumor specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating proteasome concentrations correlate with residual tumor mass and might be a prognostic variable in ovarian cancer following primary therapy.
Authors: Ludmila V Spirina; Nataliya V Yunusova; Irina V Kondakova; Larisa A Kolomiets; Valeriya D Koval; Alena L Chernyshova; Olga V Shpileva Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Lynn A Beer; Huan Wang; Hsin-Yao Tang; Zhijun Cao; Tony Chang-Wong; Janos L Tanyi; Rugang Zhang; Qin Liu; David W Speicher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M de Martino; K Hoetzenecker; H J Ankersmit; G A Roth; A Haitel; M Waldert; T Klatte Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Rosie T Jiang; Anna Yemelyanova; Deyin Xing; Ravi K Anchoori; Jun Hamazaki; Shigeo Murata; Jeffrey D Seidman; Tian-Li Wang; Richard B S Roden Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 4.234