Literature DB >> 21075378

Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches--a randomized controlled trial.

Kharma C Foucher1, Markus A Wimmer, Kirsten C Moisio, Madelaine Hildebrand, Martin C Berli, Matthew R Walker, Richard A Berger, Jorge O Galante.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: While others have reported short-term comparisons between various minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and their conventional analogues, longer-term data is lacking, as is information indicating whether MIS approaches to THA provide a biomechanically complete recovery. Furthermore, different MIS approaches have not been compared. Our approaches of interest were a one-incision modified Watson-Jones, and a two-incision approach. HYPOTHESES: (1) There are significant differences in gait recovery patterns between the two surgical groups and (2) THA subjects have significant differences in function one year after surgery compared to control subjects. To test these hypotheses, THA candidates (n=26) were randomized to receive one of these MIS approaches and evaluated preoperatively, and postoperatively at 3 weeks, and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Evaluations included three-dimensional gait analysis and 24-hour step-counts. The same data were obtained from 25 control subjects. Recovery time-course was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. T-tests were used to compare controls with the pooled group of THA subjects. We found no differences between the two THA surgical groups regarding the time-course of recovery (p≥0.591). Although recovery was statistically complete by 3 months postoperatively for all variables, there were significant differences from controls at 12 months. Most notably, the external hip adduction moment, which reflects hip abductor function, was more than one standard deviation below normal (p<0.001). THA subject inactivity could not explain the gait differences, since one year after surgery daily step counts were not significantly different from controls (p=0.346). More work is necessary to determine ways to improve biomechanical outcomes for today's patients with high expectations for function and implant longevity.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075378     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  18 in total

1.  Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH) and Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH) arthroplasty: learning curves and early outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin J Rasuli; Wade Gofton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  [The minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A review of the literature].

Authors:  A Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Gait analysis after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  K Sander; F Layher; C Anders; A Roth; J Babisch; H-C Scholle; R W Kinne
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total hip: early experiences & case reports.

Authors:  James Chow; Brad Penenberg; Stephen Murphy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-09

5.  [Current knowledge on minimally invasive hip replacement].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Röttinger approach with dual-mobility cup to improve functional recovery in hip osteoarthritis patients: biomechanical and clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Pierre Martz; Abderrahmane Bourredjem; Davy Laroche; Marc Arcens; Ludovic Labattut; Christine Binquet; Jean-Francis Maillefert; Emmanuel Baulot; Paul Ornetti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Kinematic Gait Analysis After Primary Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review: Gait After Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luis Mendiolagoitia; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez; Irene Crespo; Miguel Del Valle; Hugo Olmedillas
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Are Harris hip scores and gait mechanics related before and after THA?

Authors:  Omar A Behery; Kharma C Foucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Incorporating Specific Functional Strength Integration Techniques to Improve Functional Performance for Veterans After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dana L Judd; Victor A Cheuy; Jeri E Forster; Cory L Christiansen; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-11-25

10.  Outcomes of minimally invasive anterolateral THA are not superior to those of minimally invasive direct lateral and posterolateral THA.

Authors:  Nelson V Greidanus; Samir Chihab; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Michael Tanzer; Allan E Gross; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.