Literature DB >> 21075172

Recovery of motor performance deterioration induced by a demanding finger motor task does not follow cortical excitability dynamics.

L Avanzino1, A Tacchino, G Abbruzzese, A Quartarone, M F Ghilardi, L Bonzano, P Ruggeri, M Bove.   

Abstract

The performance of a demanding exercise can result in motor performance deterioration and depression of primary motor cortex excitability. In the present work we defined a motor task that requires measurable skilled performance to unveil motor performance changes during the execution of a demanding task and to investigate the dynamics of motor performance and cortical excitability changes in absence of overt peripheral fatigue. Twenty-one normal subjects, divided into three groups were asked to perform a sequence of finger opposition movements (SEQ) paced at 2 Hz for 5 min, quantitatively evaluated by means of a sensor-engineered glove able to perform a spatio-temporal analysis of motor performance. Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was evaluated before and after the motor task in group 1 while motor evoked potentials (MEP) were evaluated before and after the motor task in group 2 and 3. Group 1 and 2 performed the 5 min-SEQ while group 3 was asked to perform the 5 min-SEQ twice to assess the dynamics of motor performance and cortical excitability. As a result, we found that the execution of 5 min-SEQ induced motor performance deterioration associated with no change in MVC but a decrease in cortical excitability. We further found that the dynamics of cortical excitability and motor performance were different. In fact, a short rest period (i.e., period necessary to collect MEP) between the execution of two 5 min-SEQs was able to recover the motor performance but not the cortical excitability. Finally, no change in spinal excitability was observed. These findings suggest that although primary motor cortex seems to be mainly involved in motor performance deterioration during the execution of a demanding finger motor task, the recovery of motor performance does not follow cortical excitability dynamics. Copyright Â
© 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21075172     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  7 in total

1.  Post-exercise depression in corticomotor excitability after dynamic movement: a general property of fatiguing and non-fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  W P Teo; J P Rodrigues; F L Mastaglia; G W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motor evoked potential depression following repetitive central motor initiation.

Authors:  Benzi M Kluger; Candace Palmer; Johanna T Shattuck; William J Triggs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Ning Jiang; Andrew James Thomas Stevenson; Imran Khan Niazi; Vladimir Kostic; Aleksandra Pavlovic; Sasa Radovanovic; Milica Djuric-Jovicic; Federica Agosta; Kim Dremstrup; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal discrimination threshold with healthy aging.

Authors:  Vesper Fe Marie Llaneza Ramos; Alina Esquenazi; Monica Anne Faye Villegas; Tianxia Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 5.  Spinal plasticity in robot-mediated therapy for the lower limbs.

Authors:  Andrew Jt Stevenson; Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Edwin van Asseldonk; Duncan L Turner; Erika G Spaich
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Do Differences in Levels, Types, and Duration of Muscle Contraction Have an Effect on the Degree of Post-exercise Depression?

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Decrease in short-latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement.

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Ryoki Sasaki; Shinichi Kotan; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.