Literature DB >> 21074582

EMG activity in response to static and dynamic facial expressions.

Krystyna Rymarczyk1, Cezary Biele, Anna Grabowska, Henryk Majczynski.   

Abstract

The EMG activity associated with static and dynamic facial expressions (morphs with happy or angry emotions) were compared. We hypothesized that dynamic faces would (a) enhance facial muscular reactions and (b) evoke higher intensity ratings. Our analysis showed that dynamic expressions were rated as more intense than static ones. Subjects reacted spontaneously and rapidly to happy faces with increased zygomaticus major EMG activity and decrease corrugator supercilii EMG activity - showing greater changes in response to dynamic than to static stimuli in both muscles. In contrast, angry faces evoked no alteration of EMG activity in zygomaticus muscles and only small changes in the corrugator muscle EMG, and there was no difference between the responses to static and dynamic stimuli. It may be concluded that the dynamic property facilitates processing of facial expressions of emotions.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074582     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  30 in total

1.  Do Dynamic Compared to Static Facial Expressions of Happiness and Anger Reveal Enhanced Facial Mimicry?

Authors:  Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Widespread and lateralized social brain activity for processing dynamic facial expressions.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Reiko Sawada; Yasutaka Kubota; Sayaka Yoshimura; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Automatic facial mimicry in response to dynamic emotional stimuli in five-month-old infants.

Authors:  Tomoko Isomura; Tamami Nakano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Acute effects of alcohol on error-elicited negative affect during a cognitive control task.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Subnormal short-latency facial mimicry responses to dynamic emotional facial expressions in male adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits.

Authors:  Anton van Boxtel; Ruud Zaalberg; Minet de Wied
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.348

Review 6.  Motor, emotional, and cognitive empathy in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and conduct disorder.

Authors:  Danielle Bons; Egon van den Broek; Floor Scheepers; Pierre Herpers; Nanda Rommelse; Jan K Buitelaar; Jan K Buitelaaar
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-04

7.  Prolonged marital stress is associated with short-lived responses to positive stimuli.

Authors:  Regina C Lapate; Carien M van Reekum; Stacey M Schaefer; Lawrence L Greischar; Catherine J Norris; David R W Bachhuber; Carol D Ryff; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The face of negative affect: trial-by-trial corrugator responses to negative pictures are positively associated with amygdala and negatively associated with ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity.

Authors:  Aaron S Heller; Regina C Lapate; Kaitlyn E Mayer; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Influence of ethnic group-membership and gaze direction on the perception of emotions. A cross-cultural study between Germany and China.

Authors:  Katharina Krämer; Gary Bente; Siyang Luo; Ulrich J Pfeiffer; Shihui Han; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Self-relevance appraisal influences facial reactions to emotional body expressions.

Authors:  Julie Grèzes; Léonor Philip; Michèle Chadwick; Guillaume Dezecache; Robert Soussignan; Laurence Conty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.