Literature DB >> 21074284

Persistence of probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal tract when administered as capsules, yoghurt, or cheese.

Maija Saxelin1, Anna Lassig, Heli Karjalainen, Soile Tynkkynen, Anu Surakka, Heikki Vapaatalo, Salme Järvenpää, Riitta Korpela, Marja Mutanen, Katja Hatakka.   

Abstract

Most clinical studies of probiotics use freeze-dried, powdered bacteria or bacteria packed in capsules. However, probiotics are commercially available in various food matrices, which may affect their persistence in the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of the study was to compare oral and faecal recovery during and after administration of a combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and LC705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii subsp. shermanii JS, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb12 as capsules, yoghurt, or cheese. This randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial (n=36) included a 4-week run-in, 2-week intervention, and 3-week follow-up period. Participants consumed 10(10)cfu/day of probiotic combination and provided saliva and faecal samples before, during, and after the intervention. Strain-specific real-time PCR was used to quantify the strains. L. rhamnosus GG was the only probiotic strain regularly recovered in saliva samples. During the intervention period it was recovered in the saliva of 88% of the volunteers at least once. No difference was found between the yoghurt and cheese groups. At the end of the intervention, L. rhamnosus GG and LC705 counts were high in faecal samples of all product groups (8.08 and 8.67log(10) genome copies/g, respectively). There was no matrix effect on strain quantity in faeces or the recovery time after ceasing the intervention. For P. freudenreichii subsp. shermanii JS and B. animalis subsp. lactis Bb12, a matrix effect was found at the end of the intervention (P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively) and in the recovery time during follow-up (P<0.05 for both). Yoghurt yielded the highest faecal quantity of JS and Bb12 strains (8.01 and 9.89log(10) genome copies/g, respectively). The results showed that the administration matrix did not influence the faecal quantity of lactobacilli, but affected faecal counts of propionibacteria and bifidobacteria that were lower when consumed in cheese. Thus, the consumption of probiotics in yoghurt matrix is highly suitable for studying potential health benefits and capsules provide a comparable means of administration when the viability of the strain in the capsule product is confirmed.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074284     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  31 in total

Review 1.  A review of the advancements in probiotic delivery: Conventional vs. non-conventional formulations for intestinal flora supplementation.

Authors:  Mershen Govender; Yahya E Choonara; Pradeep Kumar; Lisa C du Toit; Sandy van Vuuren; Viness Pillay
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Short-term consumption of probiotic lactobacilli has no effect on acid production of supragingival plaque.

Authors:  Aino Marttinen; Anna Haukioja; Sára Karjalainen; Lotta Nylund; Reetta Satokari; Carina Öhman; Pernilla Holgerson; Svante Twetman; Eva Söderling
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Dual-Color Bioluminescence Imaging for Simultaneous Monitoring of the Intestinal Persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactococcus lactis in Living Mice.

Authors:  Catherine Daniel; Sabine Poiret; Véronique Dennin; Denise Boutillier; Delphine Armelle Lacorre; Benoit Foligné; Bruno Pot
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Supplementation of Labneh with Passion Fruit Peel Enhanced Survival of E. coli Nissle 1917 during Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion and Adhesion to Caco-2 Cells.

Authors:  Mohamed Samir Darwish; Noha A Abou-Zeid; Ebtihal Khojah; Huda A Al Jumayi; Garsa A Alshehry; Eman H Algarni; Asmaa A Elawady
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  Genomic Stability and Phenotypic Characteristics of Industrially Produced Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG in a Yogurt Matrix.

Authors:  Marianne Stage Strickertsson; Yan Hui; Dennis Sandris Nielsen; Natalia Ivonne Vera-Jiménez; Jeanne Olsen; Albin Sandelin; Anita Wichmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 6.  The yin and yang of bacterial resilience in the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Molly K Gibson; Mitchell W Pesesky; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Milk fermented by Propionibacterium freudenreichii induces apoptosis of HGT-1 human gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Fabien J Cousin; Sandrine Jouan-Lanhouet; Marie-Thérèse Dimanche-Boitrel; Laurent Corcos; Gwénaël Jan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Fermented Foods, Health and the Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Natasha K Leeuwendaal; Catherine Stanton; Paul W O'Toole; Tom P Beresford
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The canine isolate Lactobacillus acidophilus LAB20 adheres to intestinal epithelium and attenuates LPS-induced IL-8 secretion of enterocytes in vitro.

Authors:  Veera Kainulainen; Yurui Tang; Thomas Spillmann; Susanne Kilpinen; Justus Reunanen; Per E J Saris; Reetta Satokari
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Severe eosinophilic syndrome: highly unlikely associated with the use of probiotic supplements!

Authors:  Arthur C Ouwehand; Ger T Rijkers
Journal:  Case Rep Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.