Literature DB >> 21074282

Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who use cochlear implants.

Andrea D Warner-Czyz1, Betty Loy, Emily A Tobey, Paul Nakonezny, Peter S Roland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examination of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents who wear a cochlear implant (CI) primarily has depended on parent proxy report of the child's HRQoL rather than child self-report and generic domains rather than CI-specific issues. This study simultaneously assessed self-report ratings on a generic HRQoL instrument and a preliminary CI module in pediatric CI users. The impact of demographic factors (chronologic age, age at CI, and CI experience) on HRQoL also was explored.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 138 children grouped by chronologic age: 4-7, 8-11 and 12-16 years. The KINDL(R) questionnaire for measuring HRQoL in children and adolescents (generic) and a preliminary CI module (specific) were completed as a researcher-administered interview (4-7 years) or self-administered questionnaire (8-16 years) at CI summer camp or home. Scores were transformed to a 100-point scale with 100 representing the most positive response. The impact of chronologic age group on HRQoL ratings was evaluated using Analysis of Variance. Spearman rank-order correlations and point-biserial correlations tested associations between demographic factors and HRQoL scores. Principal factor analysis was used to discover the factor structure and internal consistency of the preliminary CI module.
RESULTS: The youngest group (M=82.8) rated generic HRQoL significantly more positively than older children (8-11 years: M=75.3; 12-16 years: M=70.4). Similar significant results emerged on the overall CI module (4-7 years: M=79.8; 8-11 years: M=77.8; 12-16 years: M=71.3). The youngest group rated CI-specific items on friends and self-image more positively than older groups, but reported greater difficulties hearing teachers at school. The oldest group provided more consistent responses than younger groups on the CI module (Cronbach α=0.72). Generic and CI module scores correlated positively (r=0.19, p=.03) but this association reflects the strong correlation in the oldest group (r=0.49, p=0.0033) and camouflages non-significant results in younger groups.
CONCLUSION: Chronologic age impacts self-report of HRQoL for pediatric CI users such that younger children rate HRQoL more positively than older children and adolescents on a generic instrument and preliminary CI module. Older children provide more consistent responses on the CI module. Results support the need for further development of a CI-specific self-report HRQoL instrument.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074282     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  9 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation updates: the Dallas Cochlear Implant Program.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Lana Britt; Ann Geers; Philip Loizou; Betty Loy; Peter Roland; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Charles G Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lauren Roland; Caroline Fischer; Kayla Tran; Tara Rachakonda; Dorina Kallogjeri; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.

Authors:  Deepa Suneel; Lisa S Davidson; Judith Lieu
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2019-10-07

4.  Assessment of health-related quality of life 6 years after childhood cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rachel L Meserole; Christine M Carson; Anne W Riley; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Laurie S Eisenberg; Emily A Tobey; Howard W Francis; John K Niparko
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Evaluation of quality of life after paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jekaterina Byčkova; Justė Simonavičienė; Vaiva Mickevičienė; Eugenijus Lesinskas
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2018

6.  Restricted Speech Recognition in Noise and Quality of Life of Hearing-Impaired Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants - Need for Studies Addressing This Topic With Valid Pediatric Quality of Life Instruments.

Authors:  Maria Huber; Clara Havas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12

7.  Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Life Quality in children and adolescents in Norwegian Sign Language.

Authors:  Chris Margaret Aanondsen; Thomas Jozefiak; Kerstin Heiling; Stian Lydersen; Tormod Rimehaug
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Health-related quality of life in children who use cochlear implants or hearing aids.

Authors:  Olga María Alegre-de la Rosa; Luis Miguel Villar-Angulo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 9.  Measures of quality of life in children with cochlear implant: systematic review.

Authors:  Marina Morettin; Maria Jaquelini Dias dos Santos; Marcela Rosolen Stefanini; Fernanda de Lourdes Antonio; Maria Cecília Bevilacqua; Maria Regina Alves Cardoso
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 May-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.