Literature DB >> 21074122

Observational study of adherence to European clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in revascularized versus non-revascularized patients - the CONNECT Study.

Pierre Sabouret1, Philippe Asseman, Jean Dallongeville, Jean-Jacques Dujardin, François Philippe, Marie-Annick Herrmann, Gilles Montalescot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The CONNECT study compared clinician adherence to guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapies prescribed at discharge for patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in those managed initially with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; revascularized) and those who did not undergo revascularization.
METHODS: Patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years, hospitalized for a documented ST-segment elevation or non-ST-segment elevation ACS, were enrolled consecutively over 1 month at 238 sites in France.
RESULTS: Compared with revascularized patients (n=870), non-revascularized patients (n=706) were significantly older, and a greater proportion were women, had high-blood pressure, type-2 diabetes or a history of atherothrombotic or cardiac disease, but a smaller proportion had a history of coronary angioplasty. On discharge, non-revascularized patients were prescribed beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists less frequently than revascularized patients. An adherence score greater than or equal to 80% (at least four of the five recommended agents prescribed at discharge) was found in 96.7% of revascularized patients and 74.4% of non-revascularized patients (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a similar or even higher level of cardiovascular risk, non-revascularized ACS patients were prescribed guideline-recommended secondary prevention therapy less frequently than revascularized patients. 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074122     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  6 in total

1.  Implementation of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines in Clinical Practice-Can We Do Better?

Authors:  Kornelia Kotseva
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Predictors of in-Hospital Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Interventional Treatment. An Analysis of Data from the RO-STEMI Registry.

Authors:  Diana E Cretu; Cristian A Udroiu; Claudiu I Stoicescu; Gabriel Tatu-Chitoiu; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Complexity of Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Authors:  Pierre Sabouret; Michael P Savage; David Fischman; Francesco Costa
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.571

4.  Pharmacist role to enhance the prescribing of hospital discharge medications for patients after heart attack.

Authors:  Amina M Jabri; Hayder Ch Assad; Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Application of the Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Russian Federation: Data from the Federal Registry.

Authors:  Yuliya V Popova; Anton R Kiselev; Olesya V Sagaydak; Olga M Posnenkova; Vladimir I Gridnev; Elena V Oshchepkova
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2021-06

6.  Pre- and in-hospital antithrombotic management patterns and in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome: data from the Turkish arm of the EPICOR study.

Authors:  Fatih Sinan Ertaş; Lale Tokgözoğlu
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.596

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.