Literature DB >> 21074075

[Importance of patient involvement in disease self-management: the expert patient. Role of new technologies to support patient autonomy].

José Manuel Millaruelo Trillo1.   

Abstract

Because of population aging in our geographical and social setting and progress in preventing premature death, there is an ever-increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, in this case diabetes. In our environment, the dietary changes and sedentariness that have led to the spectacular rise in obesity have increased the prevalence of diabetes. Our health system is reasonably well prepared to manage acute disease but neither health professionals nor referral circuits -nor probably patients- are prepared for the new scenario. Consequently, we should prepare ourselves for the management of chronic disease, encourage patient participation in decision-making and promote a new, less paternalistic, paradigm of the doctor-patient relationship. The experiences initiated by the University of Stanford, or in Spain by the National Patients' Forum, could serve as models. In the next few years, the figure of the expert patient will undoubtedly be highly useful. In general, physicians and patients place a great deal of faith in the contribution of new treatments and technologies to the relief or management of disease. To deny this in the XXI century would be ridiculous, but all the possibilities of these treatments and technologies only show positive results in suitably educated patients. This is a task that should never be forgotten.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074075      PMCID: PMC8171394          DOI: 10.1016/S0212-6567(10)70007-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  14 in total

Review 1.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Authors:  C Charles; T Whelan; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  "Expert patient"--dream or nightmare?

Authors:  Joanne Shaw; Mary Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-27

Review 4.  Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sune Rubak; Annelli Sandbaek; Torsten Lauritzen; Bo Christensen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing?

Authors:  Nora Moumjid; Amiram Gafni; Alain Brémond; Marie-Odile Carrère
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Jo Ellins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-07

7.  Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious?

Authors:  Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-14

8.  Implementing an empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program.

Authors:  Martha M Funnell; Robin Nwankwo; Mary Lou Gillard; Robert M Anderson; Tricia S Tang
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

9.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review.

Authors:  Henk A van Dam; Frans van der Horst; Bart van den Borne; Rick Ryckman; Harry Crebolder
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.