Literature DB >> 21074014

A pilot study of the Copper T380A IUD and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception.

David K Turok1, Shawn E Gurtcheff, Erin Handley, Sara E Simonsen, Christina Sok, Patricia Murphy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the willingness of women presenting for emergency contraception (EC) to enroll in a study offering the copper intrauterine device (IUD) or oral levonorgestrel (LNG) and follows up the two groups for 6 months after EC administration to compare use of an effective method of contraception. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective observational study offered these two methods to women presenting for EC. The primary outcome was use of an effective method of contraception 6 months after presenting for EC.
RESULTS: Thirty-four women (60%) chose oral LNG and 23 (40%) chose the copper IUD. One month after presenting for EC, 21 (96%) of 22 in the IUD group were still using the IUD and all 22 were using an effective method of contraception (efficacy ≥92%). In the LNG group, 13 (52%) of 25 were using an effective method of contraception (p<.001). At 6 months, 9 (69%) of 13 IUD users and 11 (52%) of 21 oral LNG EC users were using an effective method (p=NS).
CONCLUSION: Women presenting for EC were willing to enroll in a study offering the copper IUD or oral LNG.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21074014     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.

Authors:  David K Turok; Janet C Jacobson; Amna I Dermish; Sara E Simonsen; Shawn Gurtcheff; Molly McFadden; Patricia A Murphy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Criterion-based screening for sexually transmitted infection: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of commonly used questions.

Authors:  Patricia Aikins Murphy; Janet Jacobson; David K Turok
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Video counseling about emergency contraception: an observational study.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Linh A Moran; Madeline Mullholand; Erica Torres; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Interventions for emergency contraception.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Yan Che; Emily Showell; Ke Chen; Linan Cheng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 5.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Haoping Zhu; Norman Goldstuck; Linan Cheng; James Trussell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Practical Advice for Emergency IUD Contraception in Young Women.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Dirk Wildemeersch
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2015-07-29

7.  Interventions for emergency contraception.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Yan Che; Emily Showell; Ke Chen; Linan Cheng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.