Literature DB >> 21073821

Straight to colonoscopy: the ideal patient pathway for the 2-week suspected cancer referrals?

Andrew D Beggs1, Ravinda D Bhate, Shashi Irukulla, Mayen Achiek, A Muti Abulafi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The UK has a higher mortality for colon cancer than the European average. The UK Government introduced a 2-week referral target for patients with colorectal symptoms meeting certain criteria and 62-day target for the delivery of treatment from the date of referral for those patients diagnosed with cancer. Hospitals are expected to meet 100% and 95% of these targets, respectively; therefore, an efficient and effective patient pathway is required to deliver diagnosis and treatment within this period. It is suggested that 'straight-to-test' will help this process and we have examined our implementation of 'straight-to-colonoscopy' as a method of achieving this aim. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective audit of 317 patients referred under the 2-week rule over a 1-year period between October 2004 and September 2005 and were eligible for 'straight-to-colonoscopy'. Demographic data, appropriateness of referral and colonoscopy findings were obtained. The cost effectiveness and impact on waiting period were also analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 317 patients were seen within 2 weeks. Cancer was found in 23 patients and all were treated within 62 days. Forty-four patients were determined by the specialist to have been referred inappropriately because they did not meet NICE referral guidelines. No cancer was found in any of the inappropriate referrals. The use of straight-to-test colonoscopy lead to cost savings of £26,176 (£82.57/patient) in this group compared to standard practice. There was no increase in waiting times.
CONCLUSIONS: Straight-to-colonoscopy for urgent suspected cancer referrals is a safe, feasible and cost-effective method for delivery of the 62-day target and did not lead to increase in the endoscopy waiting list.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21073821      PMCID: PMC3293303          DOI: 10.1308/003588411X12851639107917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Survival of Cancer Patients in Europe: The EUROCARE-2 study.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1999

2.  Trends in cancer survival in England and Wales.

Authors:  D Sharp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?

Authors:  R Jones; G Rubin; P Hungin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

Review 4.  Colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M J Mäkinen
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Prospective, five-year follow-up study of patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease.

Authors:  Tarek A Salem; Richard G Molloy; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Referral letters for 2-week wait suspected colorectal cancer do not allow a 'straight-to-test' pathway.

Authors:  M M Aljarabah; N R Borley; A J Goodman; J M D Wheeler
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Factors affecting attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening in the primary care population.

Authors:  T Taskila; S Wilson; S Damery; A Roalfe; V Redman; T Ismail; R Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

2.  Straight-to-test for the two-week-wait colorectal cancer pathway under the updated NICE guidelines reduces time to cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  J Christopher; T R Flint; H Ahmed; N Dhir; R Li; K Macfarland; Dzs Ng; Jmk Ng; C O'Neill; A Te Water Naudé; K Sloan; N R Hall; M P Powar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Primary-to-secondary care referral experience of suspected colorectal malignancy in young adults.

Authors:  K Patel; T Doulias; T Hoad; C Lee; J C Alberts
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Improving colorectal cancer referrals.

Authors:  Claire Gregory
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-01-20

5.  COVID-19 recovery: tackling the 2-week wait colorectal pathway backlog by optimising CT colonography utilisation.

Authors:  N O'Donohoe; S Jamal; J Cope; L Strom; S Ryan; J W Nunoo-Mensah
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  "One stop" clinic for upper gastrointestinal cancer-an alternative to "straight to test" referrals?

Authors:  Marina Yiasemidou; Ross Lathan; Manfred Lambertz; Chitakattil Oommen; Ian Chetter
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 1.568

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.