Literature DB >> 21073775

Perceptions of emergency medicine residents and fellows regarding competence, adverse events and reporting to supervisors: a national survey.

Steven Marc Friedman1, Robert J Sowerby, Ray Guo, Glen Bandiera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the perceptions of emergency medicine (EM) residents and fellows of their clinical and procedural competence, as well as their attitudes, practices and perceived barriers to reporting these perceptions to their supervisors.
METHODS: A Web-based survey was distributed to residents and fellows, via their residency directors, in all Canadian EM residency programs outside of Quebec.
RESULTS: Of 220 residents and fellows contacted in 9 of 10 EM programs of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and 12 of 13 EM programs of The College of Family Physicians of Canada, 82 (37.3%) completed all or part of the survey. Response rates varied slightly by question; 25 of 82 re-spondents (30.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.9%-41.1%]) agreed with the statement, "I sometimes feel unsafe or un-qualified with undertaking unsupervised responsibilities or procedures, but I do not report this to my senior physician" and 32 of 81 (39.5% [95% CI 28.2%-50.8%]) had felt this within the past 6 months. Moreover, 34 of 82 (41.5% [95% CI 30.2%-52.7%]) reported their lack of competence to a supervisor half the time or less. Trainees reported worry about loss of trust, autonomy or respect (38/80, 47.5% [95% CI 35.9%-59.1%]) or reputation (32/80, 40.0% [95% CI 28.6%-51.4%]). Nights on-call (30/79, 38% [95% CI 26.6%-49.3%]), admission decisions (13/79, 16.5% [7.6%-25.3%]) and central line insertion (13/79, 16.5% [95% CI 7.6%-25.3%]) were reported to be frequently undertaken despite not feeling competent. Suggestions to improve reporting included encouragement to report without penalty (41/82, 50.0% [95% CI 38.6%-61.4%]) and a less judgmental environment (32/82, 39.0% [95% CI 27.9%-50.2%]).
CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine trainees report that they frequently do not feel competent when undertaking responsibilities without supervision. Barriers to reporting these feelings or reporting adverse events appear to relate to social pressures and authority gradients. Modifications to the training culture are encouraged to improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21073775     DOI: 10.1017/s1481803500012719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  5 in total

1.  Impact of providing case-specific knowledge in simulation: a theory based study of learning.

Authors:  Jocelyn Cox; Marion McGregor; Dominic Giuliano; Loretta Howard
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2016-10-28

2.  When the Learner Is the Expert: A Simulation-Based Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Faculty.

Authors:  Emily S Binstadt; Rachel A Dahms; Amanda J Carlson; Cullen B Hegarty; Jessie G Nelson
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-19

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of Strategies to Increase Patient Safety Event Reporting by Residents.

Authors:  Maria Aaron; Adam Webb; Ulemu Luhanga
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-08

4.  Assessment of patient safety culture: what tools for medical students?

Authors:  M Chaneliere; F Jacquet; P Occelli; S Touzet; V Siranyan; C Colin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Karen Mattick; Mark Pearson; Nicola Brennan; Simon Briscoe; Geoff Wong
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.