Literature DB >> 21073616

Trends and perioperative outcomes of inpatient antireflux surgery in the United States, 1993-2006.

Y R Wang1, D T Dempsey, J E Richter.   

Abstract

Antireflux surgery is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but postoperation complications and durability may be problematic. The objective of the study was to determine whether inpatient antireflux surgery continued to decline in the United States due to concerns about its long-term effectiveness and the popularity of gastric bypass surgery and to assess recent changes in its perioperative outcomes. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified adult patients undergoing inpatient antireflux surgery during 1993-2006 and compared the trends of inpatient antireflux surgery with inpatient gastric bypass surgery. Perioperative complications included laceration, splenectomy, transfusion, esophageal dilation, total parenteral nutrition, and infection. Inpatient antireflux surgery increased from 9173 in 1993 to 32 980 in 2000 (+260%) but then decreased to 19 668 in 2006 (-40%). Compared with 2000, patients undergoing inpatient antireflux surgery in 2006 were older (49.9 ± 32.4 vs. 54.6 ± 33.6 years) and had a longer length of stay (3.1 ± 10.0 vs. 3.7 ± 13.4 days), more complications (4.7% vs. 6.1%), and higher mortality (0.26% vs. 0.54%) (all P < 0.05). Compared with inpatient gastric bypass surgery, length of stay was longer and mortality was higher for inpatient antireflux surgery in 2006, but neither was significant controlling for age. In 2006, perioperative outcomes of inpatient antireflux surgery were better in high-volume hospitals (all P < 0.01). Inpatient antireflux surgery continued to decline in the United States from 2000 to 2006, concomitant with a dramatic increase in inpatient gastric bypass surgery. Older patient age and worsening perioperative outcomes for inpatient antireflux surgery suggest increased medical complexity and possibly a larger share of reoperations over time. Designating centers of excellence for antireflux surgery based on local expertise may improve outcomes.
© 2010 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21073616     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01123.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  26 in total

1.  Morbidity and mortality associated with antireflux surgery with or without paraesophogeal hernia: a large ACS NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Anne O Lidor; David C Chang; Richard L Feinberg; Kimberley E Steele; Michael A Schweitzer; Marianne M Franco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The combined effect of age and body mass index on outcomes in foregut surgery: a regression model analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

Authors:  Prashanth Palvannan; Irving Miranda; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Nationwide inpatient sample: have antireflux procedures undergone regionalization?

Authors:  Paul D Colavita; Igor Belyansky; Amanda L Walters; Victor B Tsirline; Alla Y Zemlyak; Amy E Lincourt; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic versus open hernia repair: outcomes and sociodemographic utilization results from the nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Paul D Colavita; Victor B Tsirline; Amanda L Walters; Amy E Lincourt; Igor Belyansky; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Update in procedural therapy for GERD--magnetic sphincter augmentation, endoscopic transoral incisionless fundoplication vs laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Michael X Min; Robert A Ganz
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-02

6.  A Review of New Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Robert A Ganz
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-07

7.  SAGES technology and value assessment committee (TAVAC) safety and effectiveness analysis: LINX® reflux management system.

Authors:  Dana A Telem; Andrew S Wright; Paresh C Shah; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Update on fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.

Authors:  Stefan Niebisch; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06

Review 9.  [Antireflux operations: indications and techniques].

Authors:  H Feussner; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Effect of Vagus Nerve Integrity on Short and Long-Term Efficacy of Antireflux Surgery.

Authors:  S van Rijn; N F Rinsma; M Y A van Herwaarden-Lindeboom; J Ringers; H G Gooszen; P J J van Rijn; R A Veenendaal; J M Conchillo; N D Bouvy; Adrian A M Masclee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.