Literature DB >> 21073029

Application of revised dengue classification criteria as a severity marker of dengue viral infection in Indonesia.

Parwati Setiono Basuki1, Dwiyanti Puspitasari, Dominicus Husada, Widodo Darmowandowo, Soegeng Soegijanto, Atsushi Yamanaka.   

Abstract

A prospective study of dengue infected patients at Dr.Soetomo Hospital pediatric ward was carried out from October 2008 to April 2009 to evaluate the revised dengue classification system proposed by the Dengue Control (DENCO), for early detection of severe dengue infected patients using the WHO classification system for comparison, with the addition of clinical interventions as a tool to grade for severity. One hundred forty-five patients were included in the study. Using the WHO classification system, 122 cases (84.1%) were classified as having non-severe dengue, of which 70 (48.3%) were classified as having dengue fever (DF), 39 (26.9%) as having dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) grade I, and 13 (9%) as having DHF grade II. Twenty-three (15.9%) were classified as having severe dengue, of which 16 (11%) were classified as having DHF grade III and 7 (4.8%) as having DHF grade IV. With clinical interventions included, 8 cases (6.6%) originally classified as having non-severe dengue infection were reclassified as having severe infection (sensitivity = 74%, specificity = 100%, likelihood ratio (-) = 0.26). Using the new dengue classification system, 117 cases (80.7%) were classified as having non-severe dengue infection, of which 79 (54.5%) were classified as having dengue without warning signs and 38 (26.2%) were classified as having dengue with warning signs, while 28 (19.3%) were classified as having severe dengue infection. Using clinical intervention, 4 cases (3.4%) which were originally classified as having non-severe dengue infection were reclassified as having severe dengue infection (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 99%, likelihood ratio (+) = 98.88, likelihood ratio (-) = 0.13). Binary logistic regression showed the revised dengue classification system (p = 0.000, Wald:22.446) was better in detecting severe dengue infections than the WHO classification system (p = 0.175, Wald:6.339).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21073029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health        ISSN: 0125-1562            Impact factor:   0.267


  24 in total

1.  Dengue--how best to classify it.

Authors:  Anon Srikiatkhachorn; Alan L Rothman; Robert V Gibbons; Nopporn Sittisombut; Prida Malasit; Francis A Ennis; Suchitra Nimmannitya; Siripen Kalayanarooj
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  WHO dengue case classification 2009 and its usefulness in practice: an expert consensus in the Americas.

Authors:  Olaf Horstick; Eric Martinez; Maria Guadalupe Guzman; Jose Luis San Martin; Silvia Runge Ranzinger
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Is Reactive Dengue NS1Antigen Test a Warning Call for Hospital Admissions?

Authors:  Sriram Pothapregada; Banupriya Kamalakannan; Mahalakshmy Thulasingam; Srinivasan Sampath
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 4.  The revised WHO dengue case classification: does the system need to be modified?

Authors:  Sri Rezeki S Hadinegoro
Journal:  Paediatr Int Child Health       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Evaluation of host and viral factors associated with severe dengue based on the 2009 WHO classification.

Authors:  Jorge O Pozo-Aguilar; Verónica Monroy-Martínez; Daniel Díaz; Jacqueline Barrios-Palacios; Celso Ramos; Armando Ulloa-García; Janet García-Pillado; Blanca H Ruiz-Ordaz
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Dengue: the syndromic basis to pathogenesis research. Inutility of the 2009 WHO case definition.

Authors:  Scott B Halstead
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 7.  Reviewing the development, evidence base, and application of the revised dengue case classification.

Authors:  O Horstick; J Farrar; L Lum; E Martinez; J L San Martin; J Ehrenberg; R Velayudhan; A Kroeger
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Dogma in classifying dengue disease.

Authors:  Jeremy J Farrar; Tran T Hien; Olaf Horstick; Nguyen T Hung; Thomas Jaenisch; Thomas Junghanns; Axel Kroeger; Ida S Laksono; Lucy Lum; Eric Martinez; Cameron P Simmons; Adriana Tami; Kay M Tomashek; Bridget A Wills
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Accuracy and applicability of the revised WHO classification (2009) of dengue in children seen at a tertiary healthcare facility in northern India.

Authors:  D Prasad; Chandrakanta Kumar; A Jain; R Kumar
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 7.455

10.  Evaluation of the WHO classification of dengue disease severity during an epidemic in 2011 in the state of Ceará, Brazil.

Authors:  Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti; Lia Alves Martins Mota; Gustavo Porto Lustosa; Mayara Carvalho Fortes; Davi Alves Martins Mota; Antônio Afonso Bezerra Lima; Ivo Castelo Branco Coelho; Maria Paula Gomes Mourão
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.