Literature DB >> 21072567

Mosaicism may explain the evolution of social characters in haplodiploid Hymenoptera with female workers.

Giorgio Morpurgo1, Nora Babudri, Bernard Fioretti, Luigi Catacuzzeno.   

Abstract

The role of haplodiploidy in the evolution of eusocial insects and why in Hymenoptera males do not perform any work is presently unknown. We show here that within-colony conflict caused by the coexistence of individuals of the same caste expressing the same character in different ways can be fundamental in the evolution of social characters in species that have already reached the eusocial condition. Mosaic colonies, composed by individuals expressing either the wild-type or a mutant phenotype, inevitably occurs during the evolution of advantageous social traits in insects. We simulated the evolution of an advantageous social trait increasing colony fitness in haplodiploid and diplodiploid species considering all possible conditions, i.e. dominance/recessivity of the allele determining the new social character, sex of the castes, and influence of mosaicism on the colony fitness. When mosaicism lowered colony fitness below that of the colony homogeneous for the wild type allele, the fixation of an advantageous social character was possible only in haplodiploids with female castes. When mosaicism caused smaller reductions in colony fitness, reaching frequencies of 90% was much faster in haplodiploids with female castes and dominant mutations. Our results suggest that the evolution of social characters is easier in haplodiploid than in diplodiploid species, provided that workers are females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21072567     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-010-9515-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  13 in total

Review 1.  Models of division of labor in social insects.

Authors:  S N Beshers; J H Fewell
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Identification of a major gene regulating complex social behavior.

Authors:  Michael J B Krieger; Kenneth G Ross
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Genetic conflicts and intercellular heterogeneity.

Authors:  J E Strassmann; D C Queller
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 4.  The evolutionary origin and elaboration of sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera: maternal effects, sib-social effects, and heterochrony.

Authors:  Timothy A Linksvayer; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 5.  Eusociality: origin and consequences.

Authors:  Edward O Wilson; Bert Hölldobler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies.

Authors:  Benjamin P Oldroyd; Jennifer H Fewell
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Genetic dissection of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging behavior.

Authors:  R E Page; M K Fondrk; G J Hunt; E Guzmán-Novoa; M A Humphries; K Nguyen; A S Greene
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  A single locus determines thelytokous parthenogenesis of laying honeybee workers (Apis mellifera capensis).

Authors:  H M G Lattorff; R F A Moritz; S Fuchs
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability.

Authors:  Julia C Jones; Mary R Myerscough; Sonia Graham; Benjamin P Oldroyd
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Genetic control of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) dance language: segregating dance forms in a backcrossed colony.

Authors:  R N Johnson; B P Oldroyd; A B Barron; R H Crozier
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.