PURPOSE: Sorafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling kinases thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of many tumors including brain tumors. Clinical trials with sorafenib in primary and metastatic brain tumors are ongoing. We evaluated the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics (PK) of sorafenib after an intravenous (IV) dose in a non-human primate (NHP) model. METHODS: 7.3 mg/kg of sorafenib free base equivalent solubilized in 20% cyclodextrin was administered IV over 1 h to three adult rhesus monkeys. Serial paired plasma and CSF samples were collected over 24 h. Sorafenib was quantified with a validated HPLC/tandem mass spectrometry assay. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. CSF penetration was calculated from the AUC(CSF) : AUC(plasma). RESULTS: Peak plasma concentrations after IV dosing ranged from 3.4 to 7.6 μg/mL. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) area under the plasma concentration from 0 to 24 h was 28 ± 4.3 μg • h/mL, which is comparable to the exposure observed in humans at recommended doses. The mean ± SD clearance was 1.7 ± 0.5 mL/min/kg. The peak CSF concentrations ranged from 0.00045 to 0.00058 μg/mL. The mean ± SD area under the CSF concentration from 0 to 24h was 0.0048 ± 0.0016 μg•h/mL. The mean CSF penetration of sorafenib was 0.02% and 3.4% after correcting for plasma protein binding. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib is well tolerated in NHP and measurable in CSF after an IV dose. The CSF penetration of sorafenib is limited relative to total and free drug exposure in plasma.
PURPOSE:Sorafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple signaling kinases thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of many tumors including brain tumors. Clinical trials with sorafenib in primary and metastatic brain tumors are ongoing. We evaluated the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics (PK) of sorafenib after an intravenous (IV) dose in a non-human primate (NHP) model. METHODS: 7.3 mg/kg of sorafenib free base equivalent solubilized in 20% cyclodextrin was administered IV over 1 h to three adult rhesus monkeys. Serial paired plasma and CSF samples were collected over 24 h. Sorafenib was quantified with a validated HPLC/tandem mass spectrometry assay. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. CSF penetration was calculated from the AUC(CSF) : AUC(plasma). RESULTS: Peak plasma concentrations after IV dosing ranged from 3.4 to 7.6 μg/mL. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) area under the plasma concentration from 0 to 24 h was 28 ± 4.3 μg • h/mL, which is comparable to the exposure observed in humans at recommended doses. The mean ± SD clearance was 1.7 ± 0.5 mL/min/kg. The peak CSF concentrations ranged from 0.00045 to 0.00058 μg/mL. The mean ± SD area under the CSF concentration from 0 to 24h was 0.0048 ± 0.0016 μg•h/mL. The mean CSF penetration of sorafenib was 0.02% and 3.4% after correcting for plasma protein binding. CONCLUSION:Sorafenib is well tolerated in NHP and measurable in CSF after an IV dose. The CSF penetration of sorafenib is limited relative to total and free drug exposure in plasma.
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth Fox; Peter M Bungay; John Bacher; Cynthia L McCully; Robert L Dedrick; Frank M Balis Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Dirk Strumberg; Jeffrey W Clark; Ahmad Awada; Malcolm J Moore; Heike Richly; Alain Hendlisz; Hal W Hirte; Joseph P Eder; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Brian Schwartz Journal: Oncologist Date: 2007-04
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Maikel Verduin; Jaap D Zindler; Hanneke M A Martinussen; Rob L H Jansen; Sander Croes; Lizza E L Hendriks; Danielle B P Eekers; Ann Hoeben Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-02-06
Authors: Brigitte C Widemann; Aerang Kim; Elizabeth Fox; Sylvain Baruchel; Peter C Adamson; Ashish M Ingle; Julia Glade Bender; Michael Burke; Brenda Weigel; Diana Stempak; Frank M Balis; Susan M Blaney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephen G Chun; Kevin S Choe; Puneeth Iyengar; John S Yordy; Robert D Timmerman Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Michael P Gabay; Scott M Wirth; Joan M Stachnik; Colleen L Overley; Katie E Long; Linda R Bressler; John L Villano Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Laurens F M Verscheijden; Jan B Koenderink; Saskia N de Wildt; Frans G M Russel Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Alberto Broniscer; Sharyn D Baker; Cynthia Wetmore; Atmaram S Pai Panandiker; Jie Huang; Andrew M Davidoff; Arzu Onar-Thomas; John C Panetta; Thomas K Chin; Thomas E Merchant; Justin N Baker; Sue C Kaste; Amar Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 12.531