Literature DB >> 2107239

Should thrombolytic therapy be administered in the mobile intensive care unit in patients with evolving myocardial infarction? A pilot study.

A Roth1, G I Barbash, H Hod, H I Miller, S Rath, M Modan, Y Har-Zahav, G Keren, S Bassan, E Kaplinsky.   

Abstract

The growing recognition of the importance of early thrombolysis in evolving myocardial infarction was the basis for the present study, which evaluated the effectiveness, feasibility and safety of prehospital thrombolytic therapy. In a relatively small study, 118 patients were allocated to receive either prehospital treatment with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in the mobile intensive care unit (group A, 74 patients) or hospital treatment (group B, 44 patients). A total of 120 mg of rt-PA was infused over a period of 6 h. All patients were fully heparinized and underwent radionuclide left ventriculography and coronary angiography during hospitalization. Although group A was treated significantly earlier than group B after onset of symptoms (94 +/- 36 versus 137 +/- 45 min, respectively; p less than 0.001), no significant differences were observed between the groups in 1) extent of myocardial necrosis, 2) global left ventricular ejection fraction at discharge, 3) patency of infarct-related artery, 4) length of hospital stay, and 5) mortality at 60 days. However, a trend to a lower incidence of congestive heart failure at hospital discharge was observed in the prehospital-treated compared with the hospital-treated group (7% versus 16%, respectively; p = NS). No major complications occurred during transportation. It is concluded that myocardial infarction can be accurately diagnosed and thrombolytic therapy initiated relatively safely during the prehospital phase by the mobile intensive care team, thus instituting a beneficial clinical trend in favor of prehospital thrombolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2107239     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90219-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10

2.  Retrospective observational case-control study comparing prehospital thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy for patients from same area.

Authors:  M S V M Chittari; I Ahmad; B Chambers; F Knight; A Scriven; D Pitcher
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  General practitioners and the treatment of myocardial infarction: the place of thrombolytic treatment.

Authors:  M C Colquhoun
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

4.  Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission.

Authors:  M W Millar-Craig; A V Joy; M Adamowicz; R Furber; B Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis.

Authors:  A C Pell; H C Miller; C E Robertson; K A Fox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.