Literature DB >> 21071878

Prospective comparison of the 5 most popular risk scores in clinical use for unselected patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Krzysztof J Filipiak1, Lukasz Koltowski, Marcin Grabowski, Grzegorz Karpinski, Renata Glowczynska, Zenon Huczek, Janusz Kochman, Franciszek Majstrak, Grzegorz Opolski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies comparing the main risk scores (RS) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have been conducted and there is a limited number of long-term observations of unselected patient cohorts evaluated with the various RS. The aim of this study was to validate 5 RS (TIMI STEMI RS, TIMI NSTEMI/UA RS, GRACE RS, SIMPLE RS and ZWOLLE RS) in a Polish population and to develop a new RS that would specifically predict 1-year mortality in the unselected ACS patient cohort. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Single-center ACS registry analysis with 1-year follow-up of 931 patients and prospective comparison of 5 RS was conducted. Creation of an RS was attempted. Risk factors were evaluated in a multivariate logistic regression model. The predictive value of the model was assessed with evaluation of the area under curve (AUC) in receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Twelve independent factors influencing 1-year mortality were identified and of them, clerking, physical findings on admission, first ECG and myocardial necrosis markers demonstrated sufficiently high predictive value. All 5 RS were successfully validated in the target registry and although they all displayed high predictive value, the TIMI RS STEMI (AUC = 0.84) and GRACE RS (AUC = 0.84) proved superior.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed Banach score offers both high goodness-of-fit and predictive value and may be used irrespective of ACS type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21071878     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  2 in total

1.  Prognostic values of 4 risk scores in Chinese patients with chest pain: Prospective 2-centre cohort study.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Chen; Hui-Lin Jiang; Yun-Mei Li; Cangel Pui Yee Chan; Jun-Rong Mo; Chao-Wei Tian; Pei-Yi Lin; Colin A Graham; Timothy H Rainer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Evaluation and Comparison of the STIMUL Extended and Simplified Risk Scores for Predicting Two-Year Death in Patients Following ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Svitlana Korol; Agnieszka Wsol; Alexander Reshetnik; Alexander Krasyuk; Kateryna Marushchenko; Liana Puchalska
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.