AIM: To compare a new two-person method (four hands) of delivering mask ventilation with a standard one-person method using the Laerdal self-inflating bag (SIB) and the Neopuff (NP) infant resuscitator in a manikin model. BACKGROUND: Recent studies of simulated neonatal resuscitation using bag and mask ventilation techniques have shown facemask leak levels of 55-57% in expert hands. METHODS:48 participants wererandomly paired and instructed to give mask ventilation for a 2-min period as single-person resuscitators, then as two-person paired resuscitators at set pressures for NP and set parameters for SIB. Airway pressure, flow, inspiratory tidal volume, expiratory tidal volume and mask leak were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 21 578 inflations were recorded and analysed. For SIB, mask leak was greater (11.5%) with single-person compared to two-person (5.4%; mean difference 6.1%, 95% CI 1.5 to 10.7, p<0.01). For NP, mask leak was greater for single-person (22.2%) compared to two-person (9.1%; mean difference 13.1% 95% CI 3.6 to 22.6, p<0.01). For single-person mask ventilation, mask leak was greater with NP (22.2%) compared to SIB (11.5%; mean difference 10.7%, 95% CI 1.4 to 19.7, p<0.01). For two-person mask ventilation, mask leak was greater for NP (9.1%) compared to SIB (5.4%; mean difference 3.7%, 95% CI 0.1 to 6.4, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Two-person mask ventilation technique reduces mask leak by approximately 50% compared to the standard one-person mask ventilation method. NP mask ventilation has higher mask leak than Laerdal SIB for both single- and two-person technique mask ventilation.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To compare a new two-person method (four hands) of delivering mask ventilation with a standard one-person method using the Laerdal self-inflating bag (SIB) and the Neopuff (NP) infant resuscitator in a manikin model. BACKGROUND: Recent studies of simulated neonatal resuscitation using bag and mask ventilation techniques have shown facemask leak levels of 55-57% in expert hands. METHODS: 48 participants were randomly paired and instructed to give mask ventilation for a 2-min period as single-person resuscitators, then as two-person paired resuscitators at set pressures for NP and set parameters for SIB. Airway pressure, flow, inspiratory tidal volume, expiratory tidal volume and mask leak were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 21 578 inflations were recorded and analysed. For SIB, mask leak was greater (11.5%) with single-person compared to two-person (5.4%; mean difference 6.1%, 95% CI 1.5 to 10.7, p<0.01). For NP, mask leak was greater for single-person (22.2%) compared to two-person (9.1%; mean difference 13.1% 95% CI 3.6 to 22.6, p<0.01). For single-personmask ventilation, mask leak was greater with NP (22.2%) compared to SIB (11.5%; mean difference 10.7%, 95% CI 1.4 to 19.7, p<0.01). For two-personmask ventilation, mask leak was greater for NP (9.1%) compared to SIB (5.4%; mean difference 3.7%, 95% CI 0.1 to 6.4, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Two-personmask ventilation technique reduces mask leak by approximately 50% compared to the standard one-personmask ventilation method. NP mask ventilation has higher mask leak than Laerdal SIB for both single- and two-person technique mask ventilation.
Authors: John Madar; Charles C Roehr; Sean Ainsworth; Hege Ersda; Colin Morley; Mario Rüdiger; Christiane Skåre; Tomasz Szczapa; Arjan Te Pas; Daniele Trevisanuto; Berndt Urlesberger; Dominic Wilkinson; Jonathan P Wyllie Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 0.892