BACKGROUND: Incubation of chronic myeloid leukemia cells in hypoxia inhibits growth and selects BCR/Abl-independent cells with stem cell properties which are refractory to imatinib-mesylate. This study aimed to characterize the relationship of this refractoriness with glucose availability in the environment. DESIGN AND METHODS: K562 or primary chronic myeloid leukemia cells were cultured at 0.1% O(2), different cell densities and glucose concentrations. The stem and progenitor cell potential of these cultures at different times of incubation in relation to BCR/Abl(protein) expression and sensitivity to imatinib-mesylate was explored by transferring cells to growth-permissive secondary cultures in normoxia, according to the Culture-Repopulating Ability assay methodology. RESULTS: Hypoxia-resistant cells maintained BCR/Abl(protein) expression until glucose was no longer available in primary hypoxic cultures, where glucose availability appeared to regulate cell number and the balance between the enrichment of cells with kinetic properties typical of stem or progenitor cells. Cells surviving merely hypoxic conditions were, upon transfer to secondary cultures, immediately available for numerical expansion due to the maintained BCR/Abl(protein) expression, and were consequently sensitive to imatinib-mesylate. Instead, BCR/Abl(protein)-negative cells selected in primary cultures under oxygen/glucose shortage underwent a delayed numerical expansion in secondary cultures, which was completely refractory to imatinib-mesylate. Cells with the latter properties were also found in primary chronic myeloid leukemia explants. CONCLUSIONS: Glucose shortage in hypoxia was shown to represent the condition selecting BCR/Abl(protein)-negative cells refractory to imatinib-mesylate from either chronic myeloid leukemia lines or patients. These cells, exhibiting stem cell properties in vitro, are metabolically suited to home to stem cell niches in vivo and so may represent the chronic myeloid leukemia cell subset responsible for minimal residual disease.
BACKGROUND: Incubation of chronic myeloid leukemia cells in hypoxia inhibits growth and selects BCR/Abl-independent cells with stem cell properties which are refractory to imatinib-mesylate. This study aimed to characterize the relationship of this refractoriness with glucose availability in the environment. DESIGN AND METHODS: K562 or primary chronic myeloid leukemia cells were cultured at 0.1% O(2), different cell densities and glucose concentrations. The stem and progenitor cell potential of these cultures at different times of incubation in relation to BCR/Abl(protein) expression and sensitivity to imatinib-mesylate was explored by transferring cells to growth-permissive secondary cultures in normoxia, according to the Culture-Repopulating Ability assay methodology. RESULTS:Hypoxia-resistant cells maintained BCR/Abl(protein) expression until glucose was no longer available in primary hypoxic cultures, where glucose availability appeared to regulate cell number and the balance between the enrichment of cells with kinetic properties typical of stem or progenitor cells. Cells surviving merely hypoxic conditions were, upon transfer to secondary cultures, immediately available for numerical expansion due to the maintained BCR/Abl(protein) expression, and were consequently sensitive to imatinib-mesylate. Instead, BCR/Abl(protein)-negative cells selected in primary cultures under oxygen/glucose shortage underwent a delayed numerical expansion in secondary cultures, which was completely refractory to imatinib-mesylate. Cells with the latter properties were also found in primary chronic myeloid leukemia explants. CONCLUSIONS:Glucose shortage in hypoxia was shown to represent the condition selecting BCR/Abl(protein)-negative cells refractory to imatinib-mesylate from either chronic myeloid leukemia lines or patients. These cells, exhibiting stem cell properties in vitro, are metabolically suited to home to stem cell niches in vivo and so may represent the chronic myeloid leukemia cell subset responsible for minimal residual disease.
Authors: Nicholas J Donato; Ji Y Wu; Jonathan Stapley; Hui Lin; Ralph Arlinghaus; Bharat B Aggarwal; Shishir Shishodia; Maher Albitar; Kimberly Hayes; Hagop Kantarjian; Moshe Talpaz; Shishir Shishodin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Susan M Graham; Heather G Jørgensen; Elaine Allan; Charlie Pearson; Michael J Alcorn; Linda Richmond; Tessa L Holyoake Journal: Blood Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Mirle Schemionek; Christian Elling; Ulrich Steidl; Nicole Bäumer; Ashley Hamilton; Tilmann Spieker; Joachim R Göthert; Martin Stehling; Amy Wagers; Claudia S Huettner; Daniel G Tenen; Lara Tickenbrock; Wolfgang E Berdel; Hubert Serve; Tessa L Holyoake; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Steffen Koschmieder Journal: Blood Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Z Ivanović; B Bartolozzi; P A Bernabei; M G Cipolleschi; E Rovida; P Milenković; V Praloran; P Dello Sbarba Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Ravi Bhatia; Melissa Holtz; Ning Niu; Rachel Gray; David S Snyder; Charles L Sawyers; Daniel A Arber; Marilyn L Slovak; Stephen J Forman Journal: Blood Date: 2003-02-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: E Del Poggetto; M Tanturli; N Ben-Califa; A Gozzini; I Tusa; G Cheloni; I Marzi; M G Cipolleschi; Y Kashman; D Neumann; E Rovida; P Dello Sbarba Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Luciana S Salaverry; Tomás Lombardo; María C Cabral-Lorenzo; Martin L Gil-Folgar; Estela B Rey-Roldán; Laura I Kornblihtt; Guillermo A Blanco Journal: Discov Oncol Date: 2022-07-08