Literature DB >> 21070602

Young transplant surgeons and NIH funding.

M J Englesbe1, R S Sung, D L Segev.   

Abstract

Transplant surgeons have historically been instrumental in advancing the science of transplantation. However, research in the current environment inevitably requires external funding, and the classic career development pathway for a junior investigator is the NIH K award. We matched transplant surgeons who completed fellowships between 1998 and 2004 with the NIH funding database, and also queried them regarding research effort and attitudes. Of 373 surgeons who completed a fellowship, only 6 (1.8%) received a K award; of these, 3 subsequently obtained R-level funding. An additional 5 individuals received an R-level grant within their first 5 years as faculty without a K award, 3 of whom had received a prior ASTS-sponsored award. Survey respondents reported extensive research experience during their training (78.8% spent median 24 months), a high proportion of graduate research degrees (36%), and a strong desire for more research time (78%). However, they reported clinical burdens and lack of mentorship as their primary perceived barriers to successful research careers. The very low rate of NIH funding for young transplant surgeons, combined with survey results that indicate their desire to participate in research, suggest institutional barriers to access that may warrant attention by the ASTS and the transplant surgery community. ©2010 The Authors Journal compilation©2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21070602     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03314.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

1.  Bench and bedside? Surgeons' views on the role of research in surgical training.

Authors:  H M Mohan; J M O'Riordan; D Collins; D B O'Connor; O Traynor; D C Winter
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding for surgery: 2003 to 2013.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Brandy L Edwards; Kendall D Brooks; Timothy E Newhook; Craig L Slingluff
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Transplant community perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of alternative quality metrics for regulation.

Authors:  Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Sheng Zhou; Alvin G Thomas; Dorry L Segev; Lauren H Nicholas
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Alvin G Thomas; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Macey L Henderson; Sarah S Stith; Dorry L Segev; Lauren Hersch Nicholas
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2018-06-10       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Facilitating Success of the Early Stage Surgeon Scientist Trainee: Growing the Surgeon Scientist Pipeline.

Authors:  Jenny C Barker; Anahita Jalilvand; Amblessed Onuma; Rita Shelby; Kejal Shah; Robert Daulton; Ginny L Bumgardner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.