Literature DB >> 21070338

Community photo-triage for skin cancer referrals: an aid to service delivery.

C A Morton1, F Downie, S Auld, B Smith, M van der Pol, P Baughan, J Wells, R Wootton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We wished to investigate the potential for extending the capacity of the specialist service by using community-based photo-triage for suspected skin cancers. AIMS: To compare the outcomes and costs of conventional and photo-triage referral pathways.
METHODS: This was an observational study of conventional and photo-triage referrals. Patients referred for initial photo-triage were invited to visit a medical photographer located in community health centres, who would take high-quality close-up and dermatoscopic images of the patients' lesions. A dermatologist then reviewed the images, and triaged patients to specific treatment clinics. All patients referred by conventional letter were offered initial appointments at the consultant-delivered skin cancer clinic. The difference in costs was assessed by modelling health service use under both pathways.
RESULTS: Photo-triage permitted 91% of patients (263/289) to achieve definitive care at first visit to the specialist team, compared with only 63% (117/186) via the conventional referral pathway. The mean waiting time to definitive treatment for patients with skin cancer was slightly reduced with photo-triage. Photo-triage permitted direct booking for 45% of patients to attend a nurse-delivered clinic, 22% to attend directly for surgery, 2% to attend a community general practice clinic and 2% to be referred on electronically to another specialty. This reduced by 72% the number of patients requiring attendance to the consultant clinic, freeing up capacity. Despite the cost of providing medical photography, there was a small cost saving of around £ 1.70 per patient using photo-triage.
CONCLUSIONS: Community photo-triage improved referral management of patients with suspected skin cancer, improving the delivery of definitive care at first visit and achieved an increased service capacity. Cost comparison found that the photo-triage model described was marginally cheaper than conventional care, and reduced hospital visits. An integrated primary-secondary care referral pathway that includes photo-triage facilitates a more efficient specialist service while ensuring that all suspicious lesions are viewed by an experienced dermatologist. © The Author(s). CED
© 2010 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21070338     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03960.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0307-6938            Impact factor:   3.470


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of Skin Cancer Referral and Consultation Using Teledermoscopy in Australia.

Authors:  Centaine L Snoswell; Liam J Caffery; Jennifer A Whitty; H Peter Soyer; Louisa G Gordon
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Dedicated general practitioner education sessions can improve diagnostic capabilities and may have a positive effect on referral patterns for common skin lesions.

Authors:  Suzanne M Beecher; Cillian Keogh; Claragh Healy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Two-week wait false alarms? A prospective investigation of 2WW head and neck cancer referrals.

Authors:  B Hong; Z Shaikh; S Adcock; S N Aldallal
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Interdisciplinary eHealth Practice in Cancer Care: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anna Janssen; Melissa Brunner; Melanie Keep; Monique Hines; Srivalli Vilapakkam Nagarajan; Candice Kielly-Carroll; Sarah Dennis; Zoe McKeough; Tim Shaw
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Inpatient Teledermatology: a Review.

Authors:  Joseph Mocharnuk; Trevor Lockard; Corey Georgesen; Joseph C English
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-04-02

6.  Teledermatology: Comparison of Store-and-Forward Versus Live Interactive Video Conferencing.

Authors:  Titus Josef Brinker; Achim Hekler; Christof von Kalle; Dirk Schadendorf; Stefan Esser; Carola Berking; Martina T Zacher; Wiebke Sondermann; Niels Grabe; Theresa Steeb; Jochen Sven Utikal; Lars E French; Alexander H Enk
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.