Literature DB >> 21069902

Latency to first seizure after temporal lobectomy predicts long-term outcome.

Sarah E Buckingham1, Inna Chervoneva, Ashwini Sharan, Andro Zangaladze, Scott Mintzer, Christopher Skidmore, Maromi Nei, James Evans, Edward Pequignot, Michael R Sperling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Temporal lobectomy is a well-established treatment for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy, yet many patients experience at least one seizure postoperatively. Little is known about the prognostic significance of the time from surgery to first seizure relapse in predicting long-term outcome.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of patients who reported at least one complex partial seizure (CPS) or generalized tonic–clonic seizure (GTCS) after anterior temporal lobectomy (n = 268), we used a nominal response logistic model to predict the odds ratio (OR) of a seizure outcome based on length of the latency period from surgery to first postoperative seizure. A modified Engel outcome class scheme was used. We controlled for factors known to influence postoperative outcome, including history of tonic–clonic seizures, intelligence quotient (IQ), preoperative seizure frequency, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and history of febrile convulsions.
RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the latency from surgery to the first postoperative disabling seizure was significantly associated with long-term outcome. Longer latency was associated with higher odds of being seizure-free or improved (modified Engel's classes 1, 2, and 3) relative to the unimproved state (class 4) (p < 0.001, 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). Conversely, a shorter latency increased the likelihood of achieving the worst prognosis (class 4) relative to class 1 (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis yielded similar results. DISCUSSION: Latency to the first postoperative seizure predicts long-term outcome, with short latencies portending poor prognosis and long latencies portending a good prognosis. This information can be used for patient counseling and may influence decisions regarding reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21069902     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02721.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  4 in total

1.  Surgery for epilepsy.

Authors:  Siobhan West; Sarah J Nevitt; Jennifer Cotton; Sacha Gandhi; Jennifer Weston; Ajay Sudan; Roberto Ramirez; Richard Newton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-25

Review 2.  Do neuroimaging results impact prognosis of epilepsy surgery? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhuo-Ran Yin; Hui-Cong Kang; Wei Wu; Min Wang; Sui-Qiang Zhu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-17

Review 3.  Rates and predictors of success and failure in repeat epilepsy surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Max O Krucoff; Alvin Y Chan; Stephen C Harward; Shervin Rahimpour; John D Rolston; Carrie Muh; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Initiating an epilepsy surgery program with limited resources in Indonesia.

Authors:  Muhamad Thohar Arifin; Ryosuke Hanaya; Yuriz Bakhtiar; Aris Catur Bintoro; Koji Iida; Kaoru Kurisu; Kazunori Arita; Jacob Bunyamin; Rofat Askoro; Surya Pratama Brilliantika; Novita Ikbar Khairunnisa; Zainal Muttaqin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.